Richmond, VA - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
| 2 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 58% | |
| 3 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 3 | MIKA Veronica | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% | |
| 5 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 6 | PAUL Lila | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 7 | GHAYALOD reya | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
| 8 | LEE Hannah | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
| 9 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
| 10 | GRAFF Sophie | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 11 | YANG Ashley M. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 21% | |
| 12 | KONG Carys H. | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 22% | |
| 13 | HILD Nisha | - | 1% | 7% | 20% | 33% | 29% | 10% |
| 14 | LUKER Sophia | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 7% | - | |
| 15 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 3% |
| 16 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | - | - | < 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 17 | JUNG Irene | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
| 18 | ALCEBAR Kayla | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 13% |
| 19 | ROMAGNOLI Isabella | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 43% | 12% | |
| 20 | MAKLIN Sofia | 1% | 8% | 30% | 41% | 19% | 2% | |
| 21 | MANSPERGER Leena | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 36% | 8% | |
| 22 | SHEARER Natalie E. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
| 23 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% | |
| 24 | HE Lizbeth | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
| 25 | LU Elaine | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 26 | HWANG Gabriela M. | 1% | 7% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 27 | JAVERI Amaya | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 28 | SINHA Anika | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 29 | WEI Vivian W. | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 30 | KHAN Alissa | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 31 | KIM Marley I. | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
| 32 | EVANS Madelynn | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 33 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
| 34 | FANG Victoria W. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 41% | 21% |
| 35 | SHI Cathleen | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% |
| 36 | TUNG Renee | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | TONG Jessie | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 38 | CHIN Sophia J. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% |
| 39 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 16% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | GOMES Diana C. | 4% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 41 | JOHNSON Lydia | 5% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 42 | KANTIPUDI Shrika | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 43 | FEIG Sela | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 44 | CHAPMAN-LAYLAND Astrid M. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 45 | MARYASH Samantha | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 46 | LIU Sophie | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | SOURIMTO Valeria | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% | |
| 48 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 49 | FESTA Carina | 13% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 50 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 1% | 9% | 24% | 32% | 23% | 9% | 1% |
| 51 | DAI Olivia | 12% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 52 | YANG Lea | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 54 | DONG Angel | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 55 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 56 | CHANG Audrey | 2% | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 57 | LIGH Erenei J. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 58 | NAYAK Indra | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 59 | YUAN Greta | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 60 | BOLTON Eleksi M. | 10% | 30% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 61 | GUTHIKONDA Sunanya | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 62 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 36% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 63 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | NATH Trisha | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 65 | XU Emily T. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 66 | CHIANG Melissa | 38% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 67 | XU ALINA | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 68 | JEONG Katie | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 69 | BAWA Anahat | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 70 | HU Michelle | 12% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 71 | GRULICH Rayaana | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 72 | ALLAIN Seraphina | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 73 | LATYSHAVA Stephanie | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.