Richmond, VA - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 2 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 58% | |
| 3 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 3 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | |
| 5 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
| 6 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
| 7 | GHAYALOD reya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
| 8 | LEE Hannah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
| 9 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 12% |
| 10 | GRAFF Sophie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 11 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% | |
| 12 | KONG Carys H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% | |
| 13 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 39% | 10% |
| 14 | LUKER Sophia | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 7% | - | |
| 15 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 3% |
| 16 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 17 | JUNG Irene | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 39% | 13% | 2% |
| 18 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% |
| 19 | ROMAGNOLI Isabella | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 12% | |
| 20 | MAKLIN Sofia | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 21% | 2% | |
| 21 | MANSPERGER Leena | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 8% | |
| 22 | SHEARER Natalie E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
| 23 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% | |
| 24 | HE Lizbeth | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 14% | 1% | |
| 25 | LU Elaine | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 26 | HWANG Gabriela M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 27 | JAVERI Amaya | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 28 | SINHA Anika | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 29 | WEI Vivian W. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 30 | KHAN Alissa | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 31 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 21% | 4% |
| 32 | EVANS Madelynn | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 33 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | |
| 34 | FANG Victoria W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
| 35 | SHI Cathleen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 36 | TUNG Renee | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 37 | TONG Jessie | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 38 | CHIN Sophia J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 39 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | GOMES Diana C. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 41 | JOHNSON Lydia | 100% | 95% | 74% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 42 | KANTIPUDI Shrika | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 43 | FEIG Sela | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 44 | CHAPMAN-LAYLAND Astrid M. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 45 | MARYASH Samantha | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 46 | LIU Sophie | 100% | 90% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 8% | |
| 48 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
| 49 | FESTA Carina | 100% | 87% | 56% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 50 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 51 | DAI Olivia | 100% | 88% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 52 | YANG Lea | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 54 | DONG Angel | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 55 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 56 | CHANG Audrey | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 57 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 58 | NAYAK Indra | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 59 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 60 | BOLTON Eleksi M. | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 61 | GUTHIKONDA Sunanya | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 62 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 63 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 13% | 1% | |
| 65 | XU Emily T. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 66 | CHIANG Melissa | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 67 | XU ALINA | 100% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 68 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 69 | BAWA Anahat | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 70 | HU Michelle | 100% | 88% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 71 | GRULICH Rayaana | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 72 | ALLAIN Seraphina | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 73 | LATYSHAVA Stephanie | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.