Richmond, VA - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HE Elizabeth W. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 2 | KONG Chin-Yi | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 3 | JING Emily | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% |
| 3 | LUNG Katerina | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 15% |
| 5 | HO Brianna W. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 43% | 24% |
| 6 | KIM Rachael | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
| 7 | CHUSID Mikayla | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 8 | SHEN Sophia H. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
| 9 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 10 | SERBAN Samantha M. | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 25% | |
| 11 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 12 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
| 13 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 13% |
| 14 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
| 15 | KIM Katherine | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | KLINE Melissa C. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 17 | KOO Rachel A. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
| 18 | APELIAN Katherine | - | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 40% | 29% |
| 19 | YU Lauren C. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 20 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 21 | LOCKE Savannah | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 22 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 38% | 15% |
| 23 | JO Mia C. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 15% |
| 24 | LEE Brianna J. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% |
| 25 | HALL Velma | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
| 26 | QIAN Crystal | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
| 27 | CHO Gracie L. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 5% |
| 28 | CHEN Jia P. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 12% |
| 29 | HUNG Juliana K. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 30 | LI Meilin | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 31 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | 1% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 32 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 33 | KOROL Neta | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 34 | CAO Arianna L. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 35 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 36 | WANG Ellen | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
| 37 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 15% |
| 38 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 39 | EYER Hailey M. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 40 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 41 | KNIGHT Skylar | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 28% |
| 42 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 6% |
| 42 | OH Erin H. | - | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 44 | LI Rachel Y. | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
| 45 | YHIP Mikaela M. | 1% | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 46 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | 2% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 47 | SENIC Adeline | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 5% |
| 48 | LI Phoebe J. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 19% | |
| 49 | LEE Bethany W. | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
| 50 | LIU Jaelyn A. | - | 2% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 51 | KHOO Lauren A. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 52 | CHEN Allison V. | - | - | 6% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 4% |
| 53 | SARTORI Taylor M. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 54 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 55 | KOSLOW Amicie | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 56 | SOLDATOVA Maria | 12% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 57 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 58 | KONG Olivia | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 59 | XU Christine | 2% | 16% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 60 | SHEN Lydia | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | |
| 61 | ORVANANOS Anice | 1% | 20% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 62 | SHIH Diane | - | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 63 | PERLMAN Talia | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 64 | COOPER Piper W. | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 65 | CHO Cameron S. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 66 | LEE Lavender | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 67 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 68 | HECKMANN Emma | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% |
| 69 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 41% | 11% |
| 70 | WU Julianna Y. | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 71 | MASSICK Laine | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 72 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 73 | MILLER Naomi E. | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 74 | MI Anning | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 75 | SUN Ruoxi | 2% | 11% | 27% | 32% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 76 | CHANG Elizabeth | 3% | 32% | 40% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 77 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | 14% | 44% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 78 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 79 | XUE Alanna L. | - | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 80 | KOROL Dana | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 81 | JANG Kimberley | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 82 | YU Seneca | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 83 | DRAGNE Alexis D. | 2% | 17% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 84 | WONG Sophia M. | 2% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 85 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | 2% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 86 | CHOW Annabelle | 23% | 45% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 87 | FERNANDES Thea | - | 3% | 20% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 88 | SIMONOV Dasha | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 89 | YIN Helen | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 90 | CASTANEDA Keira | 14% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 91 | GUERRA Sofia E. | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 92 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 93 | GU EMILY | 3% | 19% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 94 | DUAN Konnie | - | 2% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 95 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | 1% | 9% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 96 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | - | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 96 | HUANG NATALIE | 8% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 96 | LI Sophia M. | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 99 | YE Eileen | - | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% |
| 100 | ZULUETA Catherine | 21% | 49% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 101 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 56% | 37% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 102 | PANT Anisha | 3% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 103 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 24% | 50% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 104 | HSIUNG Samantha | 20% | 45% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 105 | SUN Chien-Yu | 5% | 36% | 38% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 106 | QIAN Zhiyan | 29% | 58% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 107 | SMIGRODZKI Nymeria | 15% | 47% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 108 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 109 | CHEW Alexis T. | 1% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 110 | HWANG Alison | 5% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 111 | WU Irene M. | 2% | 11% | 27% | 32% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 112 | ROY Layla | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 113 | MI Aileen | 30% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 114 | KENNEDY Elizabeth | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 115 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 55% | 39% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 116 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 46% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 117 | STONE Madelyn L. | 82% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 118 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 38% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 119 | GOLBIN Ariella J. | 79% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 120 | BRANDON Fionnoula | 48% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 120 | TSANG Catherine | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 120 | CABALU Alaina | 44% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 123 | LEVY Avery | 67% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 123 | CHOI Kailyn | 74% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 123 | BEAVER Hannah | 39% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.