Richmond, VA - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HE Elizabeth W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% |
2 | KONG Chin-Yi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
3 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% |
3 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 15% |
5 | HO Brianna W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 24% |
6 | KIM Rachael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 19% |
7 | CHUSID Mikayla | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 8% |
8 | SHEN Sophia H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
9 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
10 | SERBAN Samantha M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
11 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
12 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
13 | DAVIA Daniella V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 13% |
14 | ZHENG Ivy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
15 | KIM Katherine | 100% | 99% | 89% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
16 | KLINE Melissa C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
17 | KOO Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
18 | APELIAN Katherine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 29% |
19 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
20 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
21 | LOCKE Savannah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
22 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
23 | JO Mia C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 15% |
24 | LEE Brianna J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 10% |
25 | HALL Velma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
26 | QIAN Crystal | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
27 | CHO Gracie L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 32% | 5% |
28 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 12% |
29 | HUNG Juliana K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% |
30 | LI Meilin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
31 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
32 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
33 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
34 | CAO Arianna L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
35 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
36 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
37 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 15% |
38 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
39 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
40 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
41 | KNIGHT Skylar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% |
42 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 6% |
42 | OH Erin H. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
44 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
45 | YHIP Mikaela M. | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 2% |
46 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
47 | SENIC Adeline | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 5% |
48 | LI Phoebe J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% | |
49 | LEE Bethany W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
50 | LIU Jaelyn A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
51 | KHOO Lauren A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
52 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 28% | 4% |
53 | SARTORI Taylor M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
54 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
55 | KOSLOW Amicie | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
56 | SOLDATOVA Maria | 100% | 88% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
57 | SEO IRENE Y. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
58 | KONG Olivia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
59 | XU Christine | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
60 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 5% | |
61 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 99% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
62 | SHIH Diane | 100% | 100% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
63 | PERLMAN Talia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
64 | COOPER Piper W. | 100% | 70% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
65 | CHO Cameron S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
66 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
67 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
68 | HECKMANN Emma | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 4% |
69 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 11% |
70 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
71 | MASSICK Laine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
72 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
73 | MILLER Naomi E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
74 | MI Anning | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
75 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
76 | CHANG Elizabeth | 100% | 97% | 65% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
77 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | 100% | 86% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
78 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
79 | XUE Alanna L. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - |
80 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
81 | JANG Kimberley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
82 | YU Seneca | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
83 | DRAGNE Alexis D. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - |
84 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
85 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | 100% | 98% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
86 | CHOW Annabelle | 100% | 77% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
87 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
88 | SIMONOV Dasha | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
89 | YIN Helen | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
90 | CASTANEDA Keira | 100% | 86% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
91 | GUERRA Sofia E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
92 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 100% | 50% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
93 | GU EMILY | 100% | 97% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
94 | DUAN Konnie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
95 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - |
96 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
96 | HUANG NATALIE | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
96 | LI Sophia M. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
99 | YE Eileen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
100 | ZULUETA Catherine | 100% | 79% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
101 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 100% | 44% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
102 | PANT Anisha | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
103 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 100% | 76% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
104 | HSIUNG Samantha | 100% | 80% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
105 | SUN Chien-Yu | 100% | 95% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
106 | QIAN Zhiyan | 100% | 71% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
107 | SMIGRODZKI Nymeria | 100% | 85% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
108 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
109 | CHEW Alexis T. | 100% | 99% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
110 | HWANG Alison | 100% | 95% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
111 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
112 | ROY Layla | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
113 | MI Aileen | 100% | 70% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
114 | KENNEDY Elizabeth | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
115 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 100% | 45% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
116 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
117 | STONE Madelyn L. | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
118 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
119 | GOLBIN Ariella J. | 100% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
120 | BRANDON Fionnoula | 100% | 52% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
120 | TSANG Catherine | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
120 | CABALU Alaina | 100% | 56% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
123 | LEVY Avery | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
123 | CHOI Kailyn | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
123 | BEAVER Hannah | 100% | 61% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.