Sunnyvale, CA - Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | IVE Isaac L. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
| 2 | SHUR Yakov C. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 3 | VAN EIKEMA HOMMES Neil B. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 3 | AU Marcus J. | V D V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 5 | SMITH Zane A. | V D V V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 6 | CHON Joshua | V V V D D | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 7 | GARRETT Samuel | D V D D D V | V V V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 8 | BARRY Dominick | D V D D V D | V V V D | 4.6 | 2 | -2.6 |
| 9 | SCRIBNER Aidan C. | V V V V V V | V D | 2.2 | 6 | +3.8 |
| 10 | DORRELL Connor I. | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 11 | KIM Benjamin I. | D V V V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 12 | CAI Kevin P. | V V V D V D | V D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
| 13 | DE JONG Thijmen J. | V V D V V D | V D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
| 14 | TARBUSKOVICH III John | V D D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 15 | LIU Kirk D. | D D V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 16 | LIANG Aaron | D V V V D D | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 17 | RAJPAL Sartaj S. | D V V V V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 18 | YULE Alexander L. | D V V V V V | D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 19 | SIVAGAR Leo | V V V D D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 20 | PALLI Maximillian | D V D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 21 | KIM PAUL | D D V D V V | D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 22 | LIU Felix | V D V D D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 23 | ANDERSON Elias W. | D D D V V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 24 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | V D D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 25 | RAKHIMI Marat T. | D D V V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 26 | KOH Tommy | D V V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 27 | MILOSLAVSKY Jack | V D D D D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 28 | SHOEMAKER Thomas P. | D D V D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 29 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | D V D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 30 | ZHANG Michael | D V D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 31 | ARABACI Jack A. | V D D D D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 32 | DUONG Enoch | D D D V D D | V D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
| 33 | HUSSAIN Kamran | V D D D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 34 | MILEY Nick N. | D V D D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 35 | KENNY Oliver R. | D D D V D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 36 | ATHAVALE Pranav | D V D V D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 37 | LEE Trevor | V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 38 | LOUIE Jason | V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 39 | WANG Andrew | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 40 | PELAYO Raphael | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.