Sunnyvale, CA - Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | IVE Isaac L. | - | 1% | 13% | 37% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 2 | SHUR Yakov C. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 53% | |
| 3 | VAN EIKEMA HOMMES Neil B. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
| 3 | AU Marcus J. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 5 | SMITH Zane A. | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 6 | CHON Joshua | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 8% | |
| 7 | GARRETT Samuel | 2% | 36% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 8 | BARRY Dominick | - | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% |
| 9 | SCRIBNER Aidan C. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | < 1% |
| 10 | DORRELL Connor I. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
| 11 | KIM Benjamin I. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 12 | CAI Kevin P. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
| 13 | DE JONG Thijmen J. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
| 14 | TARBUSKOVICH III John | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 15 | LIU Kirk D. | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 16 | LIANG Aaron | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 17 | RAJPAL Sartaj S. | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 4% |
| 18 | YULE Alexander L. | - | - | - | 3% | 22% | 57% | 17% |
| 19 | SIVAGAR Leo | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 20 | PALLI Maximillian | 1% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 1% | |
| 21 | KIM PAUL | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 22 | LIU Felix | 1% | 29% | 47% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 23 | ANDERSON Elias W. | 1% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
| 24 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | 2% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 25 | RAKHIMI Marat T. | 2% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 26 | KOH Tommy | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 27 | MILOSLAVSKY Jack | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 28 | SHOEMAKER Thomas P. | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 30 | ZHANG Michael | 16% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | ARABACI Jack A. | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 32 | DUONG Enoch | - | < 1% | 8% | 41% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 33 | HUSSAIN Kamran | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 34 | MILEY Nick N. | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | KENNY Oliver R. | 12% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 36 | ATHAVALE Pranav | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 37 | LEE Trevor | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | LOUIE Jason | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
| 39 | WANG Andrew | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 40 | PELAYO Raphael | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.