May NAC

Cadet Men's Saber

Saturday, May 8, 2021 at 8:15 AM

Richmond, VA - Richmond, VA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 LIANG Connor D V V V V V V V V V V 4.4 4 -0.4
2 LINSKY Matthew D V V V V V V V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
3 SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. V V V V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
3 SOHN Kevin J. V V V V V D V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
5 WILSON Jude V V V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
6 KIM Andrew H. V D V V D V V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
7 NOBLE Daniel V V V D D V V V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
8 RAJA Arnav D V D D D V V V V D 3.4 1 -2.4
9 DHINGRA Gian K. V V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
10 KIM Avery J. D V V V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
11 JI Cody Walter V V D V V V V V D 5.0 5 -
12 HAMMERSTROM Jared D V V V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
13 LUKASHENKO Darii V D V V V D V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
14 JARAMILLO Tobias L. D D V V V V V V V D 4.0 4 -
15 SKINNER Graham B. V V V D D V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
16 BERMAN Luca D V V D D D V V V D 3.5 2 -1.5
17 JEAN Noe T. V V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
18 WIND Nicky E. V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
19 DODRILL Grant V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
20 BULL Anderson V V V V D V V D 2.8 5 +2.2
21 RIGHTLER Samuel V V V D V V V D 3.1 5 +1.9
22 HONG Vincent Q. V V V D V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
23 YANG Ziyi V V V D V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
23 CHAN Matthew V V V D V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
25 CHIN Matthew W. V D V V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
26 OVERDECK Andrew D V V V V V D 2.0 4 +2.0
27 CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. D V V V V D V D 3.3 4 +0.7
28 HONG Steven V D V D V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
29 SO Hananiah D V V V D V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
30 BERGER Oliver D V D V V D V V D 4.5 3 -1.5
31 JINICH Ilan R. V D D D D V V V D 2.2 2 -0.2
32 GREENBAUM Ian L. D D D V D V V D 2.2 1 -1.2
33 BARBER William S. V V V V V V D 3.5 6 +2.5
34 TRAVERS Samir T. V V D V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
35 JEFFORDS Alexander V V V V V D D 5.2 5 -0.2
36 XU William V V D V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
37 FERNANDEZ Rodrigo V V V V D V D 4.4 5 +0.6
38 TANN Justin D V V V V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
39 XU Luke V V D V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
40 SWORDS Evan F. V D V V V D 1.7 4 +2.3
41 ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. V V V D V D D 3.5 4 +0.5
42 LE Hayden V V V V D D D 3.9 4 +0.1
43 MAKLIN Edward P. V V V D V D V D 2.8 4 +1.2
44 DENG Andrew D V V V D V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
45 DU Gavin J. V D V V D V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
46 BABAYEV Gabriel A. V D D V V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
47 QIU Nathan V V D V V D V D 3.7 4 +0.3
48 CHANG Colin S. V D V V D V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
49 MORRILL William V D V D V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
50 TONG ZACHARY V V D D V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
51 ZHENG Edward L. D V V D V V D 1.8 3 +1.2
52 ZHOU Kevin D V V D D V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
53 LIU kelly V D V D V D V D 4.0 3 -1.0
54 YUN Jake D D V V D V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
55 KIM Shaun M. D D V D V V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
56 HOUTZ Jackson D D V D V V V D 4.1 3 -1.1
57 FENG Leo V D V V D D V D 3.2 3 -0.2
58 LINDHOLM Oliver S. V D V D V D V D 3.0 3 -
59 NOURELDIN Gabriel D D V V D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
60 SIMAK Joseph P. D D D V V D V D 3.9 2 -1.9
61 HUANG Ethan F. D V D D V D V D 3.5 2 -1.5
62 ZENG Noah D V D D V D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
63 AVAKIAN Alec D V D V D D V D 3.3 2 -1.3
64 CHEONG Heonjae D D V D D D V D 2.9 1 -1.9
65 PIWOWAR Alex D V D V V V D 2.0 4 +2.0
66 WOODWARD Connor V D V V V D D 4.2 4 -0.2
67 KAYDALIN Artyom V D V V V D D 4.5 4 -0.5
68 REN Richard V V V D D V D 2.1 4 +1.9
69 VAUGHN Jason D D V V V V D 2.0 4 +2.0
70 MORRILL Justin D V V D V V D 4.0 4 -
71 NG Jeremiah V D V D V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
72 WANG Nicolas V D D V V D 1.8 3 +1.2
73 ZUBATIY Samuel D D D V V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
74 RESHEIDAT Malik V V V D D D D 2.8 3 +0.2
75 SHASHA zane V V D D D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
76 SHIRPAL Oleksandr V V D D V D D 4.0 3 -1.0
77 MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu V D D V D D 0.7 2 +1.3
78 BERRIO Carter E. V V D D D D 2.8 2 -0.8
79 REED Samuel J. D D D V V D 0.9 2 +1.1
80 ZHANG Derek D V V D D D 1.7 2 +0.3
81 LEITH Jack D D D V D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
82 KOGAN Benjamin V D D D D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
83 EDELMAN Seth A. V V D D D D D 1.4 2 +0.6
84 ZHOU Miles D V V D D D D 3.1 2 -1.1
85 CADAMBI Roshan V D D V D D D 2.2 2 -0.2
86 NAZLYMOV Andrei V D D D V D D 2.9 2 -0.9
87 REN James D V D V D D D 1.6 2 +0.4
88 FIELDS Matthew S. D V V D D D D 2.7 2 -0.7
89 BUKOWSKI Broghan J. V D D V D D D 0.8 2 +1.2
90 KUMAR Sachit V D D D D V D 0.6 2 +1.4
91 LEUNG Nathan D V D V D D D 1.8 2 +0.2
92 JANG Junhyuk D D V D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
93 CHOI Silas V D D D V D D 2.8 2 -0.8
94 FLOT Tai A. D D D D V D 2.6 1 -1.6
95 KOTOV Leonid V D D D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
96 HOLZ William A. D D V D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
97 TANG Charles V D D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
98 WU Richard D D D D D V 1.1 1 -0.1
99 ROSBERG Dashiell W. D D D D V D 2.4 1 -1.4
99 DEPEW Spencer D D D D D V 1.0 1 -
101 DUDNICK Christian V D D D D D 1.0 1 -
102 BLEYMAN David D D D D D V 1.8 1 -0.8
103 FORT David D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
104 OH Triton D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
105 WANG Robert D D D D D D 2.5 0 -2.5
105 GOLD Carter D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
107 CHEN Evan P. D D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
108 LOWHAM-RUZZO Alexander J. D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
109 RAJAN Advait D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
110 POSY Daniel D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
111 RODGERS Jacob D D D D D D 0.1 0 -0.1
112 ZHANG Ethan W. D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
113 BONN-ELCHONESS Peter D D D D D D 0.2 0 -0.2
114 DECK Tyson D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
115 FERBER Oliver E. D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.