Richmond, VA - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HURLEY Courtney L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
| 2 | KETKAR Ketki | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 45% | 10% |
| 3 | HURLEY Kelley A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 3 | PIRKOWSKI Amanda L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
| 5 | NIXON Catherine (Kasia) D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
| 6 | PATURU Meghana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 12% |
| 7 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
| 8 | WASHINGTON Isis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% |
| 9 | MACHULSKY Leehi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 18% |
| 10 | LIU Charlene (Kai) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 40% | |
| 11 | HOLMES Katharine (Kat) W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
| 12 | GUZZI VINCENTI Margherita A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
| 13 | BASSA Francesca A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% |
| 14 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 36% | 3% |
| 15 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 16 | RUEDA Rylie | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 17 | YEU Irene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 6% |
| 18 | VAN BRUMMEN Anna C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% |
| 19 | WANG Karen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 20 | TYLER Syd | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 7% |
| 21 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 22 | FALLON Kyle R. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 23 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
| 24 | CEBULA Anne | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 10% |
| 25 | BEITTEL Chloe F. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 26 | BATES Cassandra L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% | |
| 27 | MALDONADO Pilar I. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 28 | JOYCE Michaela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
| 29 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 30 | CHIN Isabella | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 31 | KETKAR Mallika | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 8% | - |
| 32 | OXENREIDER Tierna A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 49% | 13% | |
| 33 | JAKEL Sophia N. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 34 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 35 | GRADY Miriam A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 26% | |
| 36 | MANGANO Ariana J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 37 | PARK Faith K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
| 38 | MAO Amy | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 39 | ISERT Sarah | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 40 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 20% | 2% |
| 41 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% | - |
| 42 | NI Emma | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 43 | CHU Audrey | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 44 | WATRALL Christina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 11% | |
| 45 | WU Amelia | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 46 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | ZHANG Victoria R. | 100% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 48 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 49 | WEISS Talia L. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 50 | YAMANAKA Mina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 8% |
| 51 | SZEWC Alexandra | 100% | 86% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | PADHYE Tanishka | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 53 | LUO Ashley | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 54 | WANG Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 7% |
| 55 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 16% | 1% |
| 56 | TEMIRYAEV Anna M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 57 | BOYS Nishta B. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 58 | RAUSCH Ariana (Ari) M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
| 59 | SCHMIDT Lori M. | 100% | 94% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 60 | MCLANE Lauren | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 7% |
| 61 | LEUNG Natalie | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 62 | GANDHI Sedna S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 5% |
| 63 | CHOI Eunice | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 63 | MING Cynthia | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | LIU Christina A. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 66 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 100% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 67 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
| 68 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 69 | KIM Erika S. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 70 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 71 | LIN Katie Y. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 72 | JAMES Josephine | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 73 | MORGAN Elizabeth (Ella) R. | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 74 | MEHROTRA Anya | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 75 | GAO Judy | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 76 | SAAL Anna | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 77 | LEE Michelle J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 78 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 78 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 80 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 81 | LAWSON Marie A. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 81 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 83 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | 100% | 96% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 83 | HENRY Asha S. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 85 | REID Anousheh | 100% | 92% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 86 | TONCHEVA Victoria M. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 87 | ZUHARS Renee A. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
| 88 | FELAND Alexandra | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 89 | CHAN Elizabeth | 100% | 92% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 90 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 91 | GLASSNER Sophia Rose S. | 100% | 50% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 92 | KIM Zoe L. | 100% | 91% | 57% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 93 | RASMUSSEN Ashelee | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 94 | ASHER Valerie | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 95 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 96 | WANG Nora | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 96 | CHAN Cheri K. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 98 | AHUJA Arianna | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 99 | JANOWSKI Madeline (Madeline Janowski) A. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 100 | SWEET Ryleigh E. | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 100 | EBRAHIM Ameera H. | 100% | 88% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 102 | BOWIE Charlotta | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 103 | LEANG Andrea K. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 104 | DARANOUVONG Logan | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 105 | CAREY Michele S. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 106 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 106 | WEBER Nora | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 108 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 109 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 110 | MILLER Veronica | 100% | 88% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 111 | FILIPPOV Nika D. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 112 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | 100% | 65% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 113 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
| 114 | SMITH Grace L. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 115 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | 100% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 116 | HESS Heidi J. | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.