May NAC

Div I Women's Saber

Saturday, May 8, 2021 at 1:30 PM

Richmond, VA - Richmond, VA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 STONE Anne-Elizabeth D V V V V V V V V V V V 5.4 5 -0.4
2 WOZNIAK Dagmara I. V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
3 ZAGUNIS Mariel L. V V V V V V V V V V D 5.6 6 +0.4
3 THOMPSON Kamali A. V V V V V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
5 SHELTON Aleksandra V V V D V V V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
6 TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth V V V V D V V V V D 5.0 5 -
7 FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. V D V V D V V V V D 5.5 4 -1.5
8 GREENBAUM Atara R. V D D V D D V V V V D 3.7 2 -1.7
9 LINDER Kara E. V V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
10 SULLIVAN Siobhan R. V V V V V V V V D 3.8 6 +2.2
11 JOHNSON Honor B. V V V V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
12 OISHI Megumi V V D V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
13 MILLER Sky V V V D V V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
14 RUSSO Francesca V V V V V D V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
15 WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. D D V V V V V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
16 MIKA Veronica V D D V V D V V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
17 JENKINS Ryan J. V V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
18 CHAMBERLAIN Maia C. V V V V V D V D 5.5 5 -0.5
19 GREENBAUM Ella K. V V V D V V V D 2.8 5 +2.2
20 BURKE Nora S. V V V D V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
21 ANGLADE Alexis C. D V V V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
22 ADYNSKI Gillian I. V V V V D V D 3.2 4 +0.8
23 LU Vivian Y. V V V D V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
24 AVAKIAN Mikaela V V V V D V D 3.9 4 +0.1
25 HARRILL Gillian N. V V D V V D V D 4.6 4 -0.6
26 GORMLEY Arwen E. V V V D D V V D 2.2 4 +1.8
27 POSSICK Lola P. D V V V D V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
28 CHIN Erika J. V D V D V V V D 4.0 4 -
29 GOUHIN Chloe V D V V V D V D 4.3 4 -0.3
30 SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda V D V D V V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
31 GHOSH Priyanka D V V D D V V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
32 CAO Stephanie X. V D V D D V V V D 3.0 3 -
33 LEE Alexandra B. V V V V V V D 3.8 6 +2.2
34 WILLIAMS Chloe C. V V V V V D D 4.2 5 +0.8
35 DELSOIN Chelsea C. V D V V V V D 2.8 5 +2.2
36 TONG Kunling V V D V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
37 LI Victoria J. D V V V V V D 2.7 5 +2.3
38 KONG Vera V V D V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
39 LI Amanda C. D V D V V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
40 XI Shining V V V D V D D 1.7 4 +2.3
41 FOUR-GARCIA Madison V V V D D V D 3.8 4 +0.2
42 SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne V V D V D V D 5.4 4 -1.4
43 JULIEN Michelle V V V D V D D 2.5 4 +1.5
44 KIM Zoe D V V V V D D 4.3 4 -0.3
45 ENGELMAN Madeline A. D V D V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
46 HARRISON Imogen N. V D V V D D 3.6 3 -0.6
47 PAK Kaitlyn V D D V V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
48 BOIS Adele D D V V V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
49 HULSEBURG Kaitlyn D V V D V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
50 TURNOF Kayla M. D V V D V V D 1.2 3 +1.8
51 MARSEE Samantha V D V D V V D 1.7 3 +1.3
52 LIANG Megan V D D V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
53 NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. D V D D V V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
54 ZEGERS Anneke E. V D D V D V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
55 ANDRES Katherine A. D V D V V D V D 2.0 3 +1.0
56 YUN Joy V D V D V D V D 4.0 3 -1.0
57 STONE Hava S. D V D D V V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
58 GORMAN Victoria M. D V D V V D V D 2.7 3 +0.3
59 KATZ Anat V V D D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
60 SATHYANATH Kailing D D V V D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
61 LACSON Sarah D D D V V V D 1.8 2 +0.2
62 SHEALY Maggie D D D V D V V D 3.5 2 -1.5
63 TUCKER Iman R. D D V D D V V D 2.8 2 -0.8
64 TAO Hannah J. D D V D D V V D 2.9 2 -0.9
65 TIMOFEYEV Nicole V D D V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
66 CODY Alexandra C. D V D V V D D 2.0 3 +1.0
67 FREEDMAN Janna N. V V D V D D D 3.5 3 -0.5
68 GUTHIKONDA Nithya V V D D V D D 4.0 3 -1.0
68 SHOMAN Miriam V D V V D D D 1.8 3 +1.2
70 TZOU Alexandra D V V D D V D 3.3 3 -0.3
71 CHANG Josephine S. D D D V V D 2.0 2 -
72 BLUM Leah I. V V D D D D 2.6 2 -0.6
73 CHEN Xinyan V D D V D D 1.1 2 +0.9
74 WIGGERS Susan Q. D D V D D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
75 SLOBODSKY Sasha L. D D V V D D D 0.9 2 +1.1
75 BAKER Audrey C. V D D D D V D 1.7 2 +0.3
77 BROWN Emma V D D D D V D 3.4 2 -1.4
78 KOVACS Sophia D V D D D V D 3.4 2 -1.4
79 VESTEL Mira B. D D V D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
80 DRAGON Rainer D D V D V D D 3.0 2 -1.0
81 CALVERT Sarah-Jane E. V D V D D D D 1.7 2 +0.3
82 FEARNS Zara A. V D D D V D D 2.0 2 -
83 HILD Nisha V D D D V D D 1.8 2 +0.2
84 ALCEBAR Kayla V D V D D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
85 SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. V D D D V D D 2.2 2 -0.2
85 LU Elaine D D V V D D D 1.9 2 +0.1
87 ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. V D V D D D D 1.2 2 +0.8
88 ANDRES Charmaine G. D D V D D V D 2.0 2 -
89 YONG Erika E. D D V D D 2.8 1 -1.8
90 CALLAHAN Chase J. D V D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
91 WU Erica L. D V D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
92 JUNG Irene D D V D D 0.6 1 +0.4
93 SZETO Chloe D D D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
94 KALRA Himani V. D V D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
95 CHIN Sophia J. D V D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
96 KANTIPUDI Shrika V D D D D 0.4 1 +0.6
97 BENOIT Adelaide L. D V D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
98 LU Amy D D D V D D 1.4 1 -0.4
99 BUHAY Rachel T. D D D D V D 1.6 1 -0.6
100 CHANG Emily D D D D V D 1.7 1 -0.7
100 MOZHAEVA MARIA D D D D D V 3.0 1 -2.0
100 HOLMES Emma D D D V D D 0.6 1 +0.4
103 NI Sharon D V D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
104 KOBOZEVA Tamara V. D D V D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
105 NEIBART Fiona D D D V D D 1.3 1 -0.3
106 ATLURI Sara V. D D D D D V 1.8 1 -0.8
107 HURST Kennedy D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
108 DARINGA Arianna D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
109 SHIN Andrea Y. D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
110 DANK Dina D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
111 DEPEW Charlotte R. D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
112 ZIELINSKI Isabella G. D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
113 NYSTROM Sofia C. D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.