Richmond, VA - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | STONE Anne-Elizabeth | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% |
2 | WOZNIAK Dagmara I. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% |
3 | ZAGUNIS Mariel L. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
3 | THOMPSON Kamali A. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
5 | SHELTON Aleksandra | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 47% |
6 | TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth | - | - | 1% | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
7 | FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% |
8 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
9 | LINDER Kara E. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
10 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
11 | JOHNSON Honor B. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 52% | |
12 | OISHI Megumi | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 9% |
13 | MILLER Sky | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% |
14 | RUSSO Francesca | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 47% |
15 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
16 | MIKA Veronica | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
17 | JENKINS Ryan J. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
18 | CHAMBERLAIN Maia C. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% |
19 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
20 | BURKE Nora S. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 45% | 43% | |
21 | ANGLADE Alexis C. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% | |
22 | ADYNSKI Gillian I. | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 33% | 6% | |
23 | LU Vivian Y. | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 9% | |
24 | AVAKIAN Mikaela | - | - | 4% | 22% | 48% | 25% | |
25 | HARRILL Gillian N. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 16% |
26 | GORMLEY Arwen E. | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
27 | POSSICK Lola P. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 34% | 6% |
28 | CHIN Erika J. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 4% |
29 | GOUHIN Chloe | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 9% |
30 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 43% | 12% | |
31 | GHOSH Priyanka | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
32 | CAO Stephanie X. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - |
33 | LEE Alexandra B. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 3% |
34 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 9% |
35 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 5% | - |
36 | TONG Kunling | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
37 | LI Victoria J. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
38 | KONG Vera | - | - | 6% | 26% | 43% | 25% | |
39 | LI Amanda C. | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
40 | XI Shining | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
41 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
42 | SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
43 | JULIEN Michelle | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
44 | KIM Zoe | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 36% | 7% |
45 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
46 | HARRISON Imogen N. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 16% | |
47 | PAK Kaitlyn | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
48 | BOIS Adele | - | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
49 | HULSEBURG Kaitlyn | - | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | |
50 | TURNOF Kayla M. | 23% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
51 | MARSEE Samantha | 10% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 2% | - | |
52 | LIANG Megan | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 38% | 9% | |
53 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
54 | ZEGERS Anneke E. | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
55 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 7% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
56 | YUN Joy | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 26% | 5% |
57 | STONE Hava S. | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
58 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
59 | KATZ Anat | 3% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
60 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
61 | LACSON Sarah | 6% | 30% | 45% | 18% | 2% | - | |
62 | SHEALY Maggie | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 2% |
63 | TUCKER Iman R. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | - |
64 | TAO Hannah J. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
65 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% | |
66 | CODY Alexandra C. | 6% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
67 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 2% |
68 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 5% |
68 | SHOMAN Miriam | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
70 | TZOU Alexandra | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
71 | CHANG Josephine S. | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% | - | |
72 | BLUM Leah I. | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
73 | CHEN Xinyan | 25% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
74 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
75 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
75 | BAKER Audrey C. | 10% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
77 | BROWN Emma | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
78 | KOVACS Sophia | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
79 | VESTEL Mira B. | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
80 | DRAGON Rainer | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
81 | CALVERT Sarah-Jane E. | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
82 | FEARNS Zara A. | 5% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
83 | HILD Nisha | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
84 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 2% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
85 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
85 | LU Elaine | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
87 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
88 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
89 | YONG Erika E. | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 2% | |
90 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 21% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
91 | WU Erica L. | 7% | 33% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
92 | JUNG Irene | 55% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
93 | SZETO Chloe | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | |
94 | KALRA Himani V. | 6% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
95 | CHIN Sophia J. | 10% | 45% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | |
96 | KANTIPUDI Shrika | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
97 | BENOIT Adelaide L. | 22% | 48% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
98 | LU Amy | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
99 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
100 | CHANG Emily | 12% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
100 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
100 | HOLMES Emma | 50% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
103 | NI Sharon | 13% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
104 | KOBOZEVA Tamara V. | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
105 | NEIBART Fiona | 20% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
106 | ATLURI Sara V. | 9% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
107 | HURST Kennedy | 20% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
108 | DARINGA Arianna | 37% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
109 | SHIN Andrea Y. | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
110 | DANK Dina | 54% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
111 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | 19% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
112 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | 18% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
113 | NYSTROM Sofia C. | 43% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.