May NAC

Div I Women's Saber

Saturday, May 8, 2021 at 1:30 PM

Richmond, VA - Richmond, VA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 STONE Anne-Elizabeth - - - 1% 11% 39% 49%
2 WOZNIAK Dagmara I. - - - 3% 18% 44% 35%
3 ZAGUNIS Mariel L. - - - - 5% 30% 65%
3 THOMPSON Kamali A. - - - 4% 19% 42% 34%
5 SHELTON Aleksandra - - - 1% 11% 40% 47%
6 TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth - - 1% 4% 19% 42% 34%
7 FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. - - - 1% 7% 33% 60%
8 GREENBAUM Atara R. - 2% 12% 29% 34% 19% 4%
9 LINDER Kara E. - 1% 6% 24% 42% 27%
10 SULLIVAN Siobhan R. - 2% 10% 26% 35% 22% 5%
11 JOHNSON Honor B. - - 1% 9% 39% 52%
12 OISHI Megumi - - 3% 16% 37% 35% 9%
13 MILLER Sky - - 2% 11% 30% 38% 19%
14 RUSSO Francesca - - - 2% 12% 38% 47%
15 WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. - 4% 19% 37% 31% 9%
16 MIKA Veronica 4% 18% 33% 29% 13% 3% -
17 JENKINS Ryan J. - - 2% 13% 41% 44%
18 CHAMBERLAIN Maia C. - - - 1% 7% 33% 60%
19 GREENBAUM Ella K. 2% 11% 28% 34% 20% 5% -
20 BURKE Nora S. - - 1% 11% 45% 43%
21 ANGLADE Alexis C. - - 1% 9% 38% 52%
22 ADYNSKI Gillian I. - 2% 16% 43% 33% 6%
23 LU Vivian Y. - 3% 17% 38% 34% 9%
24 AVAKIAN Mikaela - - 4% 22% 48% 25%
25 HARRILL Gillian N. - - 1% 9% 31% 42% 16%
26 GORMLEY Arwen E. 4% 20% 37% 29% 9% 1% -
27 POSSICK Lola P. - - 4% 18% 39% 34% 6%
28 CHIN Erika J. - 1% 6% 23% 40% 26% 4%
29 GOUHIN Chloe - - 3% 15% 37% 36% 9%
30 SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda - 1% 8% 36% 43% 12%
31 GHOSH Priyanka 1% 9% 30% 37% 19% 4% -
32 CAO Stephanie X. 1% 6% 23% 37% 26% 7% -
33 LEE Alexandra B. - 1% 8% 28% 40% 21% 3%
34 WILLIAMS Chloe C. - 1% 5% 18% 35% 32% 9%
35 DELSOIN Chelsea C. 1% 10% 28% 34% 21% 5% -
36 TONG Kunling - 4% 19% 36% 30% 10% 1%
37 LI Victoria J. 1% 10% 31% 36% 18% 3% -
38 KONG Vera - - 6% 26% 43% 25%
39 LI Amanda C. 2% 14% 30% 32% 17% 4% -
40 XI Shining 10% 32% 36% 18% 4% - -
41 FOUR-GARCIA Madison - 2% 10% 26% 36% 22% 4%
42 SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne - - - 1% 10% 38% 51%
43 JULIEN Michelle 3% 17% 32% 30% 14% 3% -
44 KIM Zoe - - 3% 16% 38% 36% 7%
45 ENGELMAN Madeline A. 1% 6% 21% 34% 28% 10% 1%
46 HARRISON Imogen N. - 1% 10% 32% 41% 16%
47 PAK Kaitlyn - 7% 26% 38% 23% 5%
48 BOIS Adele - 8% 30% 39% 19% 3%
49 HULSEBURG Kaitlyn - 7% 28% 40% 21% 4%
50 TURNOF Kayla M. 23% 44% 26% 6% 1% -
51 MARSEE Samantha 10% 33% 38% 17% 2% -
52 LIANG Megan - 2% 13% 37% 38% 9%
53 NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. - 2% 11% 31% 38% 16% 2%
54 ZEGERS Anneke E. - 2% 9% 26% 36% 23% 5%
55 ANDRES Katherine A. 7% 25% 35% 23% 8% 1% -
56 YUN Joy - 1% 5% 22% 42% 26% 5%
57 STONE Hava S. - 5% 21% 37% 28% 8% 1%
58 GORMAN Victoria M. 1% 11% 31% 36% 17% 3% -
59 KATZ Anat 3% 20% 40% 28% 7% 1%
60 SATHYANATH Kailing 2% 15% 36% 34% 12% 1%
61 LACSON Sarah 6% 30% 45% 18% 2% -
62 SHEALY Maggie - 3% 14% 30% 34% 17% 2%
63 TUCKER Iman R. 1% 10% 27% 34% 21% 6% -
64 TAO Hannah J. 1% 10% 27% 34% 21% 6% 1%
65 TIMOFEYEV Nicole 1% 10% 32% 38% 17% 2%
66 CODY Alexandra C. 6% 27% 37% 22% 7% 1% -
67 FREEDMAN Janna N. - 3% 14% 31% 34% 17% 2%
68 GUTHIKONDA Nithya - 1% 6% 23% 39% 27% 5%
68 SHOMAN Miriam 10% 30% 34% 19% 5% 1% -
70 TZOU Alexandra - 5% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2%
71 CHANG Josephine S. 5% 24% 40% 25% 5% -
72 BLUM Leah I. 1% 12% 33% 36% 16% 2%
73 CHEN Xinyan 25% 44% 24% 5% - -
74 WIGGERS Susan Q. 5% 20% 34% 28% 11% 2% -
75 SLOBODSKY Sasha L. 35% 44% 18% 3% - - -
75 BAKER Audrey C. 10% 33% 37% 16% 3% - -
77 BROWN Emma - 3% 15% 34% 34% 13% 1%
78 KOVACS Sophia - 4% 17% 32% 31% 13% 2%
79 VESTEL Mira B. 5% 22% 35% 27% 10% 2% -
80 DRAGON Rainer 1% 6% 23% 38% 25% 6% -
81 CALVERT Sarah-Jane E. 11% 34% 36% 16% 3% - -
82 FEARNS Zara A. 5% 27% 39% 23% 6% 1% -
83 HILD Nisha 10% 30% 35% 19% 5% 1% -
84 ALCEBAR Kayla 2% 18% 38% 30% 10% 1% -
85 SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. 5% 22% 35% 26% 10% 2% -
85 LU Elaine 7% 28% 38% 21% 5% 1% -
87 ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. 24% 42% 26% 7% 1% - -
88 ANDRES Charmaine G. 6% 25% 38% 24% 6% 1% -
89 YONG Erika E. 1% 8% 29% 40% 19% 2%
90 CALLAHAN Chase J. 21% 41% 29% 8% 1% -
91 WU Erica L. 7% 33% 39% 18% 3% -
92 JUNG Irene 55% 36% 9% 1% - -
93 SZETO Chloe 8% 30% 39% 19% 3% -
94 KALRA Himani V. 6% 32% 38% 19% 4% -
95 CHIN Sophia J. 10% 45% 34% 10% 1% -
96 KANTIPUDI Shrika 64% 31% 5% - - -
97 BENOIT Adelaide L. 22% 48% 26% 4% - -
98 LU Amy 19% 40% 30% 10% 1% - -
99 BUHAY Rachel T. 12% 34% 35% 16% 3% - -
100 CHANG Emily 12% 32% 34% 18% 5% 1% -
100 MOZHAEVA MARIA 1% 8% 24% 34% 24% 8% 1%
100 HOLMES Emma 50% 38% 10% 1% - - -
103 NI Sharon 13% 37% 34% 13% 2% - -
104 KOBOZEVA Tamara V. 9% 29% 35% 20% 6% 1% -
105 NEIBART Fiona 20% 41% 29% 8% 1% - -
106 ATLURI Sara V. 9% 30% 37% 20% 5% - -
107 HURST Kennedy 20% 39% 29% 11% 2% - -
108 DARINGA Arianna 37% 45% 16% 2% - -
109 SHIN Andrea Y. 14% 34% 33% 15% 3% - -
110 DANK Dina 54% 37% 9% 1% - -
111 DEPEW Charlotte R. 19% 43% 29% 8% 1% - -
112 ZIELINSKI Isabella G. 18% 39% 30% 10% 2% - -
113 NYSTROM Sofia C. 43% 40% 14% 2% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.