Richmond, VA - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 62% |
2 | KETKAR Ketki | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% | |
3 | FALLON Kyle R. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 8% |
3 | WANG Karen | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 28% | |
5 | PARK Faith K. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
6 | CHU Audrey | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
7 | WATRALL Christina | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
8 | PIRKOWSKI Amanda L. | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 37% |
9 | OXENREIDER Tierna A. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 34% | |
10 | JOYCE Michaela | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
11 | MANGANO Ariana J. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 34% |
12 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% | |
13 | KETKAR Mallika | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
14 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
15 | FILIPPOV Nika D. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
16 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
17 | YAMANAKA Mina | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 36% |
18 | GANDHI Sedna S. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% | |
19 | JAMES Josephine | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | < 1% | |
20 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
21 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 16% |
22 | LIU Christina A. | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | |
23 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 1% | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
24 | WONG Alexandra R. | 10% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
25 | HENRY Asha S. | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
26 | GU Sarah | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 12% |
27 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
28 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
29 | BOYS Nishta B. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
30 | TEMIRYAEV Anna M. | 1% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
31 | WANG Elizabeth | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 14% |
32 | CHOI Eunice | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
33 | CHIN Isabella | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 39% | 19% |
34 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 40% | 27% |
35 | LEE Yedda | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
36 | WEISS Talia L. | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
37 | CHAN Elizabeth | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
38 | RAUSCH Ariana (Ari) M. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
39 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
40 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 40% | 16% | |
41 | YEU Irene | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
42 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
43 | LEANG Andrea K. | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
44 | ZHANG Victoria R. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
45 | FELAND Alexandra | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
46 | LEE Michelle J. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 3% |
47 | MALDONADO Pilar I. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
47 | RUNIONS Emersyn | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
49 | BEITTEL Chloe F. | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 45% | 20% | |
50 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | 11% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | |
51 | WU Amelia | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% | |
52 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | 3% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 6% | - | |
53 | NI Emma | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
54 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
55 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
56 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
56 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
58 | MEHROTRA Anya | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
59 | TYLER Syd | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 42% | 18% |
60 | SAAL Anna | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
61 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 1% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
62 | SZEWC Alexandra | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
63 | KORFONTA Jolie | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
64 | CHENG Ava | - | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
65 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
66 | LIN Katie Y. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% | |
67 | KIM Zoe L. | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
68 | SMUK Daria A. | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
69 | MCCLAIN-YU Eri M. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
70 | LUO Ashley | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
71 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | - |
72 | WANG Nora | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
73 | PADHYE Tanishka | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
74 | REID Anousheh | 5% | 21% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
75 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
76 | GAO Judy | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
77 | AHUJA Arianna | 1% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
78 | LEUNG Natalie | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 5% | |
79 | MILEWSKI Nicole | 4% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - | |
80 | DESAI Meera P. | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
81 | LI Alisha | 37% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
82 | WITTE Vera | 6% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
83 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
84 | MUN Brianna K. | 42% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
85 | BYBEE Lucy J. | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
86 | SMITH Grace L. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
87 | LU Samantha R. | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | |
88 | CHAN Cheri K. | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
88 | YAO KATHARINE | 19% | 46% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
90 | CALDERA Lexi I. | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
90 | LONADIER Keira | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
92 | JANOWSKI Madeline (Madeline Janowski) A. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
93 | DUARTE-GARCIA Zoya A. | 31% | 46% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
94 | ZENG Katrina | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
95 | PAN Michelle | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
96 | PALANSKI Cate | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
97 | NGUYEN Audrey | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
98 | MILLER Veronica | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
99 | SHERTZ Kira E. | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
99 | WEBER Nora | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
101 | BONDAR Nika | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
102 | HIRSCH Naomi B. | 27% | 46% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
103 | KIM Erika S. | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
104 | HESS Heidi J. | 11% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
105 | LIU Nicole | 42% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
106 | MACEDON Gianna | 68% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | |
107 | MOON Seojung | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
108 | MAO Amy | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
109 | PEELER Julia | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
110 | HU Chelsea | 45% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
111 | ZAKHAROV Anne (Anya) E. | 16% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
112 | MING Cynthia | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
113 | EBRAHIM Ameera H. | 4% | 20% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
114 | BOLES Savvianna | 26% | 47% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.