Fike Recreation Center - Clemson, SC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | FULLERTON Houston T. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
2 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
3 | JUNG Ho(Daniel) (Daniel) Y. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 43% | 45% |
3 | JOSEPH William | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% | |
5 | CHEN Wesley | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% | |
6 | CLICK Aiden | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 45% | 31% |
7 | LANGE Eric A. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 10% | |
8 | JONES Tyler | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
9 | MOORE Jeremy S. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 86% |
10 | LENAHAN Conor J. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 45% | 12% |
11 | DAVIS Campbell | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 9% |
12 | MALLOY Patrick G. | - | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
13 | TILAKA Michael | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | - |
14 | THOMPSON Daniel M. | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
15 | VIVEROS Evan | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
16 | BERNARD Jack B. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
17 | SCHULZ Annie L. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 46% | 31% | |
18 | MERRITT Frederick Ross | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
19 | WALKER Luke | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
20 | WEBSTER Davis G. | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
21 | SCHARF Ryan | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
22 | MODULLA Yathin | 5% | 37% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - | |
23 | ALLEY Everett T | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
24 | CLICK Tristan | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
25 | COREY Colin | 3% | 20% | 44% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
26 | LE Kevin | 2% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
27 | GOMEZ Victor J. | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
28 | ARNOLD Benjamin | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
28 | CHRONISTER Charles | - | 4% | 28% | 43% | 22% | 3% | |
30 | LIM Joshua | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
31 | YI Daniel | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
32 | DULISSE ALeX | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
33 | BARCLAY Khyri | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
34 | PARK Judy | 3% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
35 | HAMILTON David F. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
36 | EVANS Grant | 1% | 9% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
37 | WEBB Jacob T. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 21% | |
38 | NG Joshua Z. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% | - |
39 | VIVEROS Oscar A. | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
40 | LEE Daehyeon | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
41 | GUNDUBOGULA Raj | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
42 | DILLE Carolina G. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
43 | HAYES Zackery | 8% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
44 | SERDAN Arturo | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 11% | - |
45 | NENE Ayush | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
46 | SARIKONDA Akhil | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
47 | PAYNE John T. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% |
48 | VIVEROS Antonio | 1% | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
49 | BARTLETT Jonathan (Jon) L. | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
50 | ZIMINSKY Karel M. | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 6% | |
51 | PARCELEWICZ John M. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
52 | CHEN Gabriel | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 2% | |
53 | PULLEN Ayah | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
54 | SCHUEREN Emma M. | 5% | 28% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | |
54 | MILLER Jonathan | 9% | 51% | 34% | 6% | - | - | |
56 | RUSCONI Jane | 13% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
57 | KENT Dwain | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 46% | 12% |
58 | DAVIS Elise | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
59 | BERNSTEIN Matthew B. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
60 | PAL Ian K. | 1% | 9% | 36% | 40% | 13% | 1% | - |
61 | KOKA Ashwin | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
62 | HALL Dorothy Corrina | 2% | 33% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
63 | MCGINNISS Andrew | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
64 | DEMAREE Adam | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
65 | WOLF Savana | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
66 | NIEMAN Aubrey | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
67 | ECKARD Melody | 1% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
68 | ALVARENGA Darby | 40% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
69 | NIEMAN Anjolie | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
69 | OZBOZ Almira | 12% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 1% | - | |
71 | MOSS Riley | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
72 | GOSART Hailee | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
73 | TOPPIN Lindsay | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 1% | |
74 | VINSON Rachel | 20% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
75 | CONE James | 2% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
76 | PILLAI Adithya | 49% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
77 | WEBB Zain | 59% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
78 | MATTOCKS III Charles L. | 29% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
79 | HOLT Tayla | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.