Fike Recreation Center - Clemson, SC, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SILVA Daniel | V V V V V V | V V V V | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 2 | JARDIM Kyle A. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 3 | CHEONG Heonjun | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 3 | LYON Drew | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 5 | JAYASANKAR Hari | V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 6 | BENNETT III Carl | V D V V V | V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 7 | GRAHAM Ian | D V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 8 | HAMILL Daniel | V V V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 9 | RICHERSON James | V V V V V V | D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 10 | LE Brandon | V V V V V | D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 11 | RENGER Felipe | V V D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 12 | YANG Jenny J. | V V V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 13 | QI Parker | V D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 14 | PAL Anjali G. | V D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 15 | MERRIMAN Morgan | D V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 16 | WEST Matthew S. | V V D V V | V D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
| 17 | NGO Ben | D V V V V | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 18 | COLLIER Nathanael L. | V V V D V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 19 | JUELKE Reaghan | V D D V V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 20 | LOFGREN Reese | V V V V D D | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 21 | BENNETT Anthony | V D D V V V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 22 | WEAVER Charles | D D V V V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 23 | BOONE Jason | D V V D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 24 | PATTERSON Michael | V D D V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 25 | NI Yan-Jing | V D V V D | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 26 | VIDRINE Odile | V V D D D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 27 | RODRIGUEZ Jason | D V D V D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 28 | RATTANA Anushawn | D D D V V V | D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 29 | HAGEN Samuel | D V V D V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 30 | CROWLEY James | D V V D D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 | |
| 31 | HOLDER Thomas | V D V D D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 | |
| 32 | FRANCHINI Erin | V V D D D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 | |
| 33 | SIKES Adam | D V D V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 | |
| 34 | ASHY Katia | V V D D D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 | |
| 35 | THU John | D D V D V | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 | |
| 36 | TAYLOR Kathleen | V V D D D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 | |
| 36 | BROOKS John | D V D V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 | |
| 38 | ST.PIERRE Christopher | D D V V D D | 2.0 | 2 | - | |
| 39 | CONE James | V D D V D D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 | |
| 40 | KENYON Briella | D D V D D V | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 | |
| 40 | LEE Angela | D D V D D V | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 | |
| 42 | MCCLURE Morgan | D V V D D D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 | |
| 43 | KALE Omkar | D D D V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 | |
| 44 | TAYLOR Wise | D V D D D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 | |
| 45 | WOODS Nathaniel | D D D D V | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 | |
| 46 | JORDAN Christopher | D D D V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 | |
| 47 | VINSON Rachel | V D D D D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 | |
| 48 | MUSSELMAN Matthew | V D D D D D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 | |
| 49 | FREE Sara | V D D D D D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 | |
| 50 | MEYERS Lucas | D V D D D D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 | |
| 51 | KONKON Nahomy | D D D D D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 | |
| 52 | NELSON Julia | D D D D D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 | |
| 53 | LIU Hui Hui | D D D D D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 | |
| 53 | LUSK Ian | D D D D D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 | |
| 55 | HARRIS Patrick | D D D D D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 | |
| 56 | SHELTON Victoria | D D D D D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 | |
| 57 | POSADAS Allison | D D D D D D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.