Fike Recreation Center - Clemson, SC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SILVA Daniel | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 46% |
| 2 | JARDIM Kyle A. | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% | |
| 3 | CHEONG Heonjun | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 42% | 13% | |
| 3 | LYON Drew | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% | |
| 5 | JAYASANKAR Hari | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 41% | 12% | |
| 6 | BENNETT III Carl | 2% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
| 7 | GRAHAM Ian | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 73% | |
| 8 | HAMILL Daniel | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% | |
| 9 | RICHERSON James | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 10 | LE Brandon | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 3% | |
| 11 | RENGER Felipe | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
| 12 | YANG Jenny J. | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 13 | QI Parker | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 21% | |
| 14 | PAL Anjali G. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
| 15 | MERRIMAN Morgan | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
| 16 | WEST Matthew S. | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 17 | NGO Ben | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 18 | COLLIER Nathanael L. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 19 | JUELKE Reaghan | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 6% |
| 20 | LOFGREN Reese | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 21 | BENNETT Anthony | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 22 | WEAVER Charles | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 23 | BOONE Jason | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 24 | PATTERSON Michael | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 25 | NI Yan-Jing | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | VIDRINE Odile | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | RODRIGUEZ Jason | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 28 | RATTANA Anushawn | - | 1% | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% |
| 29 | HAGEN Samuel | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
| 30 | CROWLEY James | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% | |
| 31 | HOLDER Thomas | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 32 | FRANCHINI Erin | 2% | 20% | 49% | 25% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | SIKES Adam | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 6% | |
| 34 | ASHY Katia | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | THU John | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | TAYLOR Kathleen | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 36 | BROOKS John | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 9% | |
| 38 | ST.PIERRE Christopher | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 39 | CONE James | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 40 | KENYON Briella | 6% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | LEE Angela | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 42 | MCCLURE Morgan | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 43 | KALE Omkar | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 44 | TAYLOR Wise | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 45 | WOODS Nathaniel | 2% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 46 | JORDAN Christopher | 13% | 43% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | VINSON Rachel | 24% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | MUSSELMAN Matthew | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | FREE Sara | 21% | 38% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | MEYERS Lucas | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 51 | KONKON Nahomy | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | NELSON Julia | 17% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 53 | LIU Hui Hui | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 53 | LUSK Ian | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 11% | 1% | |
| 55 | HARRIS Patrick | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 56 | SHELTON Victoria | 22% | 46% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 57 | POSADAS Allison | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.