Meadowlands Exposition Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HAFEEZ Hania | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
| 2 | MAO Amy | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
| 3 | TOLBA Salma | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% | |
| 3 | WITTE Vera | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 5 | CALDERA Lexi I. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 6 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
| 7 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% | |
| 8 | HAFEEZ Hiba | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 8% | |
| 9 | ZHU Serene M. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 10 | LI Meilin | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 11 | FURMAN Maria | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
| 12 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 31% | |
| 13 | ZENG Katrina | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
| 14 | KANEVSKY Samantha | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 15 | LATORA Jordan | 6% | 34% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 16 | GUJJA Misha | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 17 | GAO Judy | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 45% | 16% | |
| 18 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | - | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | |
| 18 | AZMEH Nour | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 20 | YANG Chloe | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
| 21 | LIU Nicole | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 22 | HUANG Natalie | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
| 23 | HALM Alexandra F. | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 24 | ZHENG Linden | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | TYTELL Elizabeth | 5% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 26 | LIN Elaine | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
| 27 | CHERNYSHOVA Victoria | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
| 28 | YOU Isabel B. | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 29 | JOSEPH Mikayla | - | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 30 | CHANG Ella | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | HU Chelsea | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | JIA Elizabeth | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
| 33 | ROMANO Julia | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 34 | RAI Ananya | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | XU Amy | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 36 | SKOURLETOS Angelina | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 18% | 2% | |
| 37 | REDDYMEKA Sameera | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
| 38 | HOSANAGAR Inchara | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 38 | KRISHNAN Amudha | 18% | 47% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | CHA Eugenie | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | BARREIRO Katrina | 57% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 43 | JOHN Venus | 23% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.