San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | JEON Alexander E. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
2 | KIM Benjamin I. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
3 | SHARMA Sanil | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
3 | WRIGHT Christopher | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
5 | PARK Elliot | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | < 1% |
6 | LOGUE Ethan D. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
7 | AU Marcus J. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
8 | GREEN Ummi | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
9 | GREEN Jabreel | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 6% |
10 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | 1% | 8% | 22% | 32% | 25% | 10% | 2% |
11 | LIANG Aaron | - | 4% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 4% |
12 | DUONG Enoch | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
13 | JAIN Sarthak | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 1% | - |
14 | KIM Aaron J. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
15 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
16 | ZHANG Alec | - | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
17 | JONES Caleb | 15% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
18 | KUO Elvin | 14% | 33% | 32% | 16% | 5% | 1% | - |
19 | AHMED Saheer | 32% | 43% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
20 | BHARGAV Siddharth | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
21 | PRAKASH Hari | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.