San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JEFFORDS Alexander | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| 2 | BAILEY Asher | - | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 3 | YANG Ziyi | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 18% |
| 3 | CHANG Colin S. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 5 | LI Joshua L. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 6 | KIM Andrew H. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
| 7 | KIBBAR Tomer L. | - | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 8 | HOLZ William A. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 9 | TANN Justin | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 10 | REYES Xavier M. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
| 11 | VO Minh Q. | 9% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 12 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 13 | LO Andrew T. | 10% | 47% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 14 | XU William | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 15 | LIN Daniel | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 16 | YOO Joshua H. | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | LIU Christopher X. | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 18 | CENTENO Zachary | 68% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 19 | KIM Ryan | 49% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 20 | JEFFRY Nicholas B. | < 1% | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.