San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JEFFORDS Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
| 2 | BAILEY Asher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 3 | YANG Ziyi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% |
| 3 | CHANG Colin S. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
| 5 | LI Joshua L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 6 | KIM Andrew H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% | |
| 7 | KIBBAR Tomer L. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 8 | HOLZ William A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 9 | TANN Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 10 | REYES Xavier M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
| 11 | VO Minh Q. | 100% | 91% | 55% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 12 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 13 | LO Andrew T. | 100% | 90% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 14 | XU William | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
| 15 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 16 | YOO Joshua H. | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | LIU Christopher X. | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 18 | CENTENO Zachary | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 19 | KIM Ryan | 100% | 51% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 20 | JEFFRY Nicholas B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.