San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KNIGHT Skylar | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
| 2 | LI Phoebe J. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 28% | |
| 3 | CHO Gracie L. | < 1% | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
| 3 | KIM Katherine | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
| 5 | YHIP Mikaela M. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 6 | YU Seneca | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 7 | KONG Chin-Yi | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 38% | 21% |
| 8 | SUN Chien-Yu | 1% | 16% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 9 | FERNANDES Thea | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 10 | KOROL Dana | - | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 11 | SUN Ruoxi | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 12 | KONG Olivia | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 5% |
| 13 | HSIUNG Samantha | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
| 14 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 15 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | - | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 16 | KOROL Neta | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 18 | SULEIMAN Alysa J. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 19 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 27% | 40% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 20 | PATTERSON Natalia | 71% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.