San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KNIGHT Skylar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 2 | LI Phoebe J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% | |
| 3 | CHO Gracie L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | |
| 3 | KIM Katherine | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 5 | YHIP Mikaela M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
| 6 | YU Seneca | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 28% | 6% |
| 7 | KONG Chin-Yi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
| 8 | SUN Chien-Yu | 100% | 99% | 82% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 9 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 10 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 100% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 11 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 12 | KONG Olivia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 5% |
| 13 | HSIUNG Samantha | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 14 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 15 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 17 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 100% | 94% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 18 | SULEIMAN Alysa J. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 19 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 100% | 73% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 20 | PATTERSON Natalia | 100% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.