San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BAILEY Asher | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 2 | BERGER Oliver | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
| 3 | CHANG Colin S. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 21% | 3% |
| 3 | TANN Justin | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
| 5 | YANG Ziyi | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 45% | 22% |
| 6 | LIN Daniel | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 7 | XU William | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
| 8 | VO Minh Q. | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 9 | JEFFORDS Alexander | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 32% |
| 10 | LI Joshua L. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
| 11 | KIBBAR Tomer L. | - | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 12 | KIM Andrew H. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 13 | BAUER Hank E. | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 14 | LIU Christopher X. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 15 | REYES Xavier M. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 16 | HAWKINS Jasper R. | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 17 | ZHANG Yankun | 25% | 43% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 18 | TAN Darren | 18% | 41% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 19 | BAILEY Nate | 7% | 39% | 37% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 20 | KIM Ryan | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 21 | CENTENO Zachary | 69% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.