San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BAILEY Asher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 14% |
| 2 | BERGER Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 3 | CHANG Colin S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 24% | 3% |
| 3 | TANN Justin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
| 5 | YANG Ziyi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 22% |
| 6 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 7 | XU William | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 8 | VO Minh Q. | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 9 | JEFFORDS Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 32% |
| 10 | LI Joshua L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
| 11 | KIBBAR Tomer L. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | 1% |
| 12 | KIM Andrew H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 13 | BAUER Hank E. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 14 | LIU Christopher X. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 15 | REYES Xavier M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 16 | HAWKINS Jasper R. | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 17 | ZHANG Yankun | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 18 | TAN Darren | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 19 | BAILEY Nate | 100% | 93% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 20 | KIM Ryan | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 21 | CENTENO Zachary | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.