San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YU Seneca | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
| 2 | KONG Olivia | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
| 3 | CHO Gracie L. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
| 3 | LI Phoebe J. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
| 5 | YHIP Mikaela M. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 6 | KOROL Dana | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 7 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 8 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 9 | SULEIMAN Alysa J. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 10 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 11 | KIM Katherine | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 12 | SUN Ruoxi | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 13 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 4% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 14 | FUNG Emma | 28% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 15 | KOROL Neta | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 16 | FERNANDES Thea | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
| 17 | SUN Chien-Yu | 1% | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 18 | PATTERSON Natalia | 60% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 19 | FUNG Vera | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 20 | HSIUNG Samantha | 11% | 35% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.