San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YU Seneca | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% | |
| 2 | KONG Olivia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | |
| 3 | CHO Gracie L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
| 3 | LI Phoebe J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 44% |
| 5 | YHIP Mikaela M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 6 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 7 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 8 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | |
| 9 | SULEIMAN Alysa J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 10 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 11 | KIM Katherine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 12 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 13 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 100% | 96% | 71% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 14 | FUNG Emma | 100% | 72% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 15 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | |
| 16 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
| 17 | SUN Chien-Yu | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 18 | PATTERSON Natalia | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 19 | FUNG Vera | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 20 | HSIUNG Samantha | 100% | 89% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.