San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHARMA Sanil | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 2 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
| 3 | JEON Alexander E. | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 39% | 49% |
| 3 | GREEN Ummi | - | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 36% | 17% |
| 5 | ZHANG Alec | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 6 | KIM Benjamin I. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 7 | GREEN Jabreel | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 8 | LOGUE Ethan D. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 9 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | < 1% |
| 10 | JAIN Sarthak | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 11 | AU Marcus J. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 12 | WRIGHT Christopher | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 13 | LIANG Aaron | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 6% |
| 14 | QUIROGA Kyle | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 15 | AHMED Saheer | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 16 | DUONG Enoch | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
| 17 | PARK Elliot | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 18 | KUO Elvin | 1% | 12% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 19 | BHARGAV Siddharth | 19% | 37% | 29% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 20 | PRAKASH Hari | 10% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 21 | ZHUANG William | 15% | 42% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.