Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | ANDRES Katherine A. | - | - | - | 9% | 42% | 48% |
| 2 | BENOIT Adelaide L. | - | - | 3% | 44% | 44% | 10% |
| 3 | HOOGENDOORN Levi | - | - | 1% | 28% | 52% | 19% |
| 3 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 5 | LIN Audrey J. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 37% |
| 6 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% |
| 7 | BUHAY Rachel T. | - | - | 5% | 35% | 45% | 14% |
| 8 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 15% |
| 9 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 44% | 20% |
| 10 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 43% | 45% |
| 11 | YANG Lea | 2% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 12 | ENDO Miyuki N. | - | 1% | 8% | 39% | 41% | 11% |
| 13 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% |
| 14 | WONG Isabelle S. | 30% | 48% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
| 15 | ROBINSON Adeline | 3% | 30% | 62% | 6% | - | - |
| 16 | MCNALLY Teagan | 24% | 47% | 26% | 3% | - | - |
| 17 | FREEDMAN Amelia F. | 18% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 18 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 3% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | PATEL Karitsa | 17% | 61% | 21% | - | - | - |
| 20 | SCHICK Veronica | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 21 | MORAN Rhea | 12% | 41% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 22 | BRAMMER-GONZALES Xiomara | 68% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 23 | VITALIS MARY | 16% | 48% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 24 | XU Stacy | 18% | 46% | 30% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.