Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 48% |
2 | BENOIT Adelaide L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 54% | 10% |
3 | HOOGENDOORN Levi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 71% | 19% |
3 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
5 | LIN Audrey J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 37% |
6 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% |
7 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% | 14% |
8 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 15% |
9 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 20% |
10 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 45% |
11 | YANG Lea | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
12 | ENDO Miyuki N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 52% | 11% |
13 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 5% |
14 | WONG Isabelle S. | 100% | 70% | 22% | 2% | - | - |
15 | ROBINSON Adeline | 100% | 97% | 68% | 6% | - | - |
16 | MCNALLY Teagan | 100% | 76% | 29% | 4% | - | - |
17 | FREEDMAN Amelia F. | 100% | 82% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - |
18 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 9% | 1% |
19 | PATEL Karitsa | 100% | 83% | 22% | - | - | - |
20 | SCHICK Veronica | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
21 | MORAN Rhea | 100% | 88% | 47% | 8% | 1% | - |
22 | BRAMMER-GONZALES Xiomara | 100% | 32% | 3% | - | - | - |
23 | VITALIS MARY | 100% | 84% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - |
24 | XU Stacy | 100% | 82% | 36% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.