Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 47% | 26% |
| 2 | SARTORI Taylor M. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 43% | 20% |
| 3 | GUERRA Sofia E. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 16% |
| 3 | NAMGALAURI Mariam | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
| 5 | SENIC Adeline | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 46% | 31% |
| 6 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% |
| 7 | CHEN Jessie S. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 16% |
| 8 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 16% | |
| 9 | TUCKER ALARCON Frida | 6% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 10 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 11 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 39% | 15% | 2% |
| 12 | PARK Leah | 43% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 13 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 38% | 13% | 1% |
| 14 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 37% | 13% | |
| 15 | UPTON Elizabeth | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 16% | |
| 16 | BIODROWICZ Julia | - | 4% | 22% | 43% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 17 | ZHANG Rongrui | 1% | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 18 | SKOURLETOS Maria | 7% | 40% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 19 | BAWA Sahana | 1% | 21% | 46% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
| 20 | KIM April | 28% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 21 | ZHENG yuqi | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 22 | LI Grace | 12% | 45% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 23 | KENNEDY Elizabeth | 9% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 24 | BASSIK Eva | 5% | 32% | 44% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 25 | PATIL Himani | 67% | 31% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 26 | KIM Claire | 15% | 50% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | EUH Jayme | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.