Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | GUZZI VINCENTI Margherita A. | V V V D V V | V V V V V | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
2 | LIPTHAY Hanna | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
3 | GARINA Ania (Ganusia) | V V V D D | V V V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
3 | KIM Natalie S. | D D V D V | V V V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
5 | SCALA Emma | V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
6 | FALINSKA Julia | V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
7 | LOMBARD Ella | V D D V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
8 | STOECKEL Sofia I. | D D D D V | V V V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
9 | GUPTA Ananya B. | V V V V V | V D | 2.2 | 5 | +2.8 |
10 | KWON Athina | D V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
11 | SEMIKIN Julia | V V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
12 | RUMMEL Katherine E. | V D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
13 | HONG Elaine | V V D D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
14 | MYLER AnneMarie | V V D V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
15 | BOTNER Olivia | D D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
16 | SCHAFF Marlene M. | D D D V V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
17 | TYLER Syd | V V V V V | D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
18 | BINDAS Blodwen S. | V V V V D | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
19 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | V V V D V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
20 | SNIDER Margot (Maggie) | V D V V D | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
21 | BURN Lauren M. | V D V D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
21 | SHEVCHENKO Viktoriia | D V V V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
23 | AHUJA Arianna | V V D V D D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
24 | XIONG Angelica | V D D V V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
25 | SWENSON Nikita G. | V V D D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
26 | CARLSON Ava | D D V V D | D | 0.4 | 2 | +1.6 |
27 | KIZILBASH Zara | D D D V V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
28 | SWENSON Alexandra | D V D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
29 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | D D D V D | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
30 | YOON Julia J. | D D D V D | V D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
31 | DU Yiyun (Doreen) | D D V D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
32 | CHAFEE Nina | D V D D D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
33 | SCHLIEP Anna J. | V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
34 | NELSON Grace E. | D D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
35 | MCKENNA Analise | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
36 | YAREMA Genevieve | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
37 | SANTOS Cara | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.