Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | VEZMAR Evan H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 2 | PRABHAKAR Vibhav | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% |
| 3 | DENNIS Ethan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
| 3 | KOZAKIEWICZ Filip | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% |
| 5 | NESTEROV Andrew E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% |
| 6 | MCKEEVER Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% |
| 7 | O'DONNELL Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
| 8 | KRZYSIAK David F. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 9 | NGUYEN Tate | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 10% |
| 9 | SATTERFIELD Donald | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 11 | SILVERS Ari | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 16% |
| 12 | SONN Rohan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
| 13 | NIKOLOV Peter | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 11% |
| 14 | KULIKOWSKI Adam J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 58% |
| 15 | LOISEAU Eliott | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
| 16 | LI Chenyu | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 17 | BORUFF Vincent (Artemis) | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 9% | 1% |
| 18 | LITWILLER Joseph | 100% | 84% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 19 | DHAL Leon | 100% | 88% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 20 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% |
| 21 | GOHSMAN Maxwell | 100% | 86% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 22 | MORGAN Cooper | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 23 | RICHARDSON Ray | 100% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 24 | PRABHAKAR Agasthya | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
| 25 | CORRALES Victor M. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 17% | 2% |
| 26 | DIVERIS Joseph | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 27 | KARNAS Karol | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 28 | YOON Brian | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | 1% |
| 29 | MILLER Lance W. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 6% |
| 30 | MCDOWELL Will | 100% | 93% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 31 | DATTA Purav | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 32 | BRADFORD Ethan | 100% | 88% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 33 | TASKIRAN Mete | 100% | 61% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | SCHWEITZER Liam | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | MURPHY Aidan | 100% | 94% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 36 | SAHA Sayan | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.