King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | - | - | 7% | 37% | 56% | |
| 2 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | 4% | 31% | 42% | 20% | 3% | |
| 3 | HUANG NATALIE | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 23% | 3% |
| 3 | YU Lauren C. | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
| 5 | SARTORI Taylor M. | - | - | 3% | 22% | 46% | 29% | |
| 6 | EYER Hailey M. | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% | |
| 7 | HO Brianna W. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 63% |
| 8 | SU Michelle | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
| 9 | HECKMANN Emma | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 10 | JANG Kimberley | - | - | 3% | 21% | 44% | 32% | |
| 11 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 39% | 8% |
| 12 | LI Meilin | - | - | 4% | 25% | 46% | 25% | |
| 13 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 29% | |
| 14 | MI Anning | 1% | 14% | 42% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 15 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | 1% | 14% | 39% | 36% | 11% | |
| 16 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | - | - | 7% | 31% | 48% | 14% | |
| 17 | LEE Lavender | - | 2% | 19% | 44% | 29% | 6% | |
| 18 | MI Aileen | 2% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 19 | ROY Layla | - | 7% | 31% | 43% | 17% | 2% | |
| 20 | GU EMILY | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 20 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
| 22 | CHOW Annabelle | 1% | 9% | 43% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 23 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 24 | WU Irene M. | - | 1% | 16% | 40% | 34% | 9% | |
| 25 | LEE Kaitlyn | 37% | 47% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 26 | ZHOU Catherine | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | PAVE Claire | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 28 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 3% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 29 | KOKES Gwendolen | 9% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | BRANDON Fionnoula | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 31% | 49% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 32 | PAULUS Isabella | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 33 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 28% | 58% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 34 | OETZEL Taylor | 44% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 35 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 36 | SHTROM Uma A. | 58% | 38% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | HOWELL Jocelyn | 36% | 52% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.