King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DAVIA Daniella V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 56% | |
| 2 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% | 23% | 3% | |
| 3 | HUANG NATALIE | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | 3% |
| 3 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
| 5 | SARTORI Taylor M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 29% | |
| 6 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% | |
| 7 | HO Brianna W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% |
| 8 | SU Michelle | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 4% | |
| 9 | HECKMANN Emma | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | |
| 10 | JANG Kimberley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 32% | |
| 11 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 8% |
| 12 | LI Meilin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 25% | |
| 13 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% | |
| 14 | MI Anning | 100% | 99% | 85% | 44% | 9% | 1% | |
| 15 | SEO IRENE Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 11% | |
| 16 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 14% | |
| 17 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 36% | 6% | |
| 18 | MI Aileen | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 19 | ROY Layla | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% | 18% | 2% | |
| 20 | GU EMILY | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 20 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 5% | |
| 22 | CHOW Annabelle | 100% | 99% | 90% | 47% | 11% | 1% | |
| 23 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 24 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 43% | 9% | |
| 25 | LEE Kaitlyn | 100% | 63% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
| 26 | ZHOU Catherine | 100% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | PAVE Claire | 100% | 94% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 28 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 29 | KOKES Gwendolen | 100% | 91% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | BRANDON Fionnoula | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 100% | 69% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 32 | PAULUS Isabella | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 33 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 100% | 72% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 34 | OETZEL Taylor | 100% | 56% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 35 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 36 | SHTROM Uma A. | 100% | 42% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | HOWELL Jocelyn | 100% | 64% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.