King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 2 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% | |
| 3 | FENG Leo | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 8% |
| 3 | MICLAUS Justin | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 5 | ZENG Noah | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 6 | KIM Matthew | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
| 7 | PANDEY Neil | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 8 | WONG Ryan | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 9 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 10 | FIELDS Matthew S. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 11 | MAKLIN Edward P. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 11 | ZHOU Miles | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
| 13 | ZHENG Edward L. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
| 14 | HONG Vincent Q. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 15 | ENGEL Peter | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 16 | CHTERENTAL Alex | 1% | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | MATSUI Alen K. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
| 18 | GLOZMAN Justin | 3% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 19 | SHTEYN Mark | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 38% | 10% | |
| 20 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
| 21 | SHTEIN Yan | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | |
| 22 | YOU Jaden | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 23 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 23 | FLITSANOV Macabee | 4% | 24% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 25 | WU Wilmund | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 28% | 9% | |
| 26 | POSY Daniel | 13% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | OH Triton | 3% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | |
| 28 | GINSBERG jordan | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 29 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | 8% | 27% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 30 | TOZZI Massimo | 14% | 34% | 32% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 31 | WEBER Mattias A. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 32 | ANAND Sahil Z. | 9% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | KOVACH Jonah F. | - | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 34 | BROU Inkosi | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
| 35 | TANG Charles | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 36 | FELDMAN Drew | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 37 | BLUMBERG Cal | 51% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 38 | UH Daniel | 4% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | STAMIS Kyle | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | WAGNER Calvin | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.