King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | V V V V D V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 2 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | V V V V D | V V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 3 | FENG Leo | V V D D V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 3 | MICLAUS Justin | V V V V V V | V V V D | 2.8 | 6 | +3.2 |
| 5 | ZENG Noah | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 6 | KIM Matthew | V V V V D | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 7 | PANDEY Neil | D V V V V | V V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 8 | WONG Ryan | V D V V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 9 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | V V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 10 | FIELDS Matthew S. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 11 | MAKLIN Edward P. | D V V D V V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 11 | ZHOU Miles | D V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 13 | ZHENG Edward L. | V V V D D V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 14 | HONG Vincent Q. | D V D V V V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 15 | ENGEL Peter | V V D V V D | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 16 | CHTERENTAL Alex | V V D D V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 17 | MATSUI Alen K. | V V V V D D | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 18 | GLOZMAN Justin | V D V V V D | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 19 | SHTEYN Mark | V V V D D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 20 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | V V D D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 21 | SHTEIN Yan | D D V V V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 22 | YOU Jaden | D D V V V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 23 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | D D D V V V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 23 | FLITSANOV Macabee | D D V V D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 25 | WU Wilmund | D V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 26 | POSY Daniel | V D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 27 | OH Triton | D D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 28 | GINSBERG jordan | D D V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 29 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | V D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 30 | TOZZI Massimo | D V D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 31 | WEBER Mattias A. | V D D D D D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 32 | ANAND Sahil Z. | D D D D V D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 33 | KOVACH Jonah F. | D D D V D V | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 34 | BROU Inkosi | D D D D V | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 35 | TANG Charles | D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 36 | FELDMAN Drew | D D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 37 | BLUMBERG Cal | V D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 38 | UH Daniel | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 39 | STAMIS Kyle | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 40 | WAGNER Calvin | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.