America's Center Convention Complex - St. Louis, MO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
2 | CHOI Silas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% | |
3 | SHOMAN Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 39% |
3 | GONZALEZ Emilio A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | |
5 | SHOMAN Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
6 | KIM Shaun M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 17% |
7 | HOLZ Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
8 | PATIL Aaryan A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | 15% | |
9 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
10 | BAE Jason I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
11 | WANG Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
12 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
13 | LIM William J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
14 | OH Triton | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% | |
15 | WANG Robert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 23% |
16 | KWALWASSER Eric | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
17 | KILARI Krish | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
18 | ZHANG Ethan W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
19 | PENG Bryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
20 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
21 | ZENG Noah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 5% |
22 | QIU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 9% |
23 | REN James | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 11% |
24 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 28% | |
25 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 11% | |
26 | TAO Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
27 | KANG Evan | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
28 | HU Christopher | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
28 | KROON Lucas | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
30 | LIU Lawrence | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
31 | SU Landon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 11% |
32 | ZHENG Edward L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 23% | |
33 | HOTHA Nikhil | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
34 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | 15% | |
35 | CHEONG Heonjun | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 7% | |
36 | GAO Albert | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
37 | RAMANAN Govind | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
38 | GUFFEY Christopher | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
39 | TURCK Caspar J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
39 | SUGIURA Samuel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
41 | BOSITA Carson | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
42 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
43 | HOUTZ Mitchell B. | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 5% | - | |
44 | PATEL Rayn | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
45 | IDRISSI Idris | 100% | 99% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
46 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Maksymilian A. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
47 | ZHOU James Y. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
47 | MICLAUS Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 18% |
49 | KANG evan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
50 | GUAN Dennis | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 5% | - |
51 | NGUYEN Anthony | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
52 | CHEEMA Hyder | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
53 | BROU Inkosi | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
53 | JORGESON Charlie | 100% | 95% | 55% | 14% | 1% | - | |
55 | HRISTOV Kris | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
56 | CHEN Lohen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 28% | 4% |
56 | WANG daniel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
58 | CHOW William T. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
59 | ANAND Rohan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
60 | KUMAR Sachit | 100% | 99% | 78% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
61 | LI Yiwei | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
62 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
63 | MEDVINSKY Daniel | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
64 | FANG Eason | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
65 | WU Richard | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
66 | HUANG Maxwell H. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
67 | EYBELMAN Ariel | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | |
68 | KUSHKOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 3% | |
69 | LIN Steve | 100% | 97% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
70 | BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
71 | HERNANDEZ Stanton | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
72 | KERCHER Alexander | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
73 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | 100% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
74 | HOLZ Lucas | 100% | 97% | 68% | 22% | 3% | - | |
75 | DAI Gary | 100% | 70% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
76 | GUREVICH Benjamin | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
77 | KALPATHY Rohit | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 5% | - |
78 | GUREVICH Savely | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
79 | LEVY Jacob | 100% | 84% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
80 | OLARIO Raphael | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
81 | HERRERA aragon | 100% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
81 | NG Jonathan | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
83 | PRIEUR Christian F. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
84 | KATZ Ryan | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
85 | HUNG Samuel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
86 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 1% | |
87 | WILKERSON Jude | 100% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | |
88 | LIGH Checed | 100% | 88% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
89 | ANAND Sahil Z. | 100% | 78% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
90 | LAM Ethan | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
91 | LIN Philip T. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
92 | WANG HongXi | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
93 | POLEYUMPTEWA Connor | 100% | 90% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.