Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% |
| 2 | SHIN Joshua J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 33% | |
| 3 | LI Arvin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 17% | |
| 3 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 5 | TSAI Max W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | 4% |
| 6 | WANG Mason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% | 8% |
| 7 | BUCKLEY-JONES Henry C. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 8 | HOWARD Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 27% | |
| 9 | WU Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | - |
| 10 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 36% | 6% | |
| 11 | MILLER Aidan A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 12 | MIALL Steven A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
| 13 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% |
| 14 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 15 | ALIMI Yacine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 30% | |
| 16 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
| 17 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% |
| 18 | XU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% | - |
| 19 | JIN Dennis H. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 30% | 5% | |
| 20 | BOUTIN Nathaniel J. | 100% | 97% | 73% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 21 | LIGH Thomas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 22 | SHAO Eric | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | CHESSA Giovanni | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 24 | WILSON Samuel S. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 25 | BOUSSY Luciano | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 26 | THADHANI Elio | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% | |
| 27 | LI Ayren | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 31% | 5% | - |
| 28 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 29 | GARDINER Luke J. | 100% | 56% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 30 | MCQUIDE Elliot | 100% | 69% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 31 | SUTARIA Julian | 100% | 88% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | PELT Ethan T. | 100% | 76% | 25% | 3% | - | - | |
| 33 | BERGERON Justin | 100% | 60% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 34 | ABRUZZESE Owen | 100% | 88% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | HAZLETT Grady | 100% | 61% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 36 | ABANILLA Luke | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | DOHONEY Tommy | 100% | 92% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | BILODEAU Leo | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 39 | EBERMAN Henry | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | DENG Kenny | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.