Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 2 | YU Nicole J. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 15% |
| 3 | HAFEEZ Hania | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 12% |
| 3 | LIN Elaine | - | 2% | 17% | 41% | 34% | 5% |
| 5 | NGUYEN Kira | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
| 6 | PRIHODKO Nina | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 7 | ZHENG Linden | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 7 | HICKS Grace | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 9 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 33% |
| 10 | PAN Michelle | - | 5% | 26% | 44% | 23% | 2% |
| 11 | GUJJA Misha | 1% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
| 12 | SONG Angela | 3% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 13 | SPRINGER Sierra | 2% | 17% | 42% | 31% | 8% | - |
| 14 | BENZAN India | 8% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 15 | AZMEH nour | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | SHU Youshan | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 17 | FENG ge | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 34% |
| 18 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 19 | COBERT Helen G. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 20 | LONADIER Keira | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
| 21 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
| 22 | TYTELL Elizabeth | 20% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 23 | XUE Alanna L. | 2% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 24 | DAGLI Niara | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 25 | SAAL Anna | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 5% |
| 26 | ANDREEV Victoria | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 27 | RAI Ananya | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 28 | SOMOL Emma | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 29 | YING Julia Y. | 1% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 30 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 9% |
| 31 | SOTELO Michelle | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | CONNOLLY Natasha | 60% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 33 | CANNING Charlotte | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 34 | LI Fei | 11% | 44% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 35 | SMUK Daria A. | < 1% | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 36 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.