Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
| 2 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 15% |
| 3 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 12% |
| 3 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% | 5% |
| 5 | NGUYEN Kira | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% |
| 6 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 7 | ZHENG Linden | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 7 | HICKS Grace | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 9 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% |
| 10 | PAN Michelle | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 26% | 2% |
| 11 | GUJJA Misha | 100% | 99% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
| 12 | SONG Angela | 100% | 97% | 73% | 33% | 7% | 1% |
| 13 | SPRINGER Sierra | 100% | 98% | 81% | 39% | 8% | - |
| 14 | BENZAN India | 100% | 92% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 15 | AZMEH nour | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | SHU Youshan | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 17 | FENG ge | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 34% |
| 18 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
| 19 | COBERT Helen G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
| 20 | LONADIER Keira | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% |
| 21 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 22 | TYTELL Elizabeth | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 23 | XUE Alanna L. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 24 | DAGLI Niara | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 25 | SAAL Anna | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 5% |
| 26 | ANDREEV Victoria | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 27 | RAI Ananya | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 28 | SOMOL Emma | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 29 | YING Julia Y. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
| 30 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 9% |
| 31 | SOTELO Michelle | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | CONNOLLY Natasha | 100% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 33 | CANNING Charlotte | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 34 | LI Fei | 100% | 89% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 35 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% |
| 36 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.