Richmond Fencing Club - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GALEMORE Jonathan | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 43% | 32% |
| 2 | SMIGRODZKI Nymeria | 9% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% | ||
| 3 | DYER John G. | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
| 3 | CLICK Aiden | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 5 | MCKEVITT Conner M. | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 46% | 16% | |
| 6 | PRICE Owen | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | < 1% | |
| 7 | TURPIE Michael (Mike) J. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 8 | MARSH Joseph J. | - | - | 5% | 33% | 45% | 17% | |
| 9 | SLACK Mary-Stuart F. | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | ||
| 10 | MELENDEZ Victor J. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 11 | NORTH Zoe M. | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 12 | WALTERS Elaine G. | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% | ||
| 13 | KOKE Matthew C. | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 14 | KAST Quinn J. | 2% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
| 15 | ISAACSON Bjorn | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
| 16 | SMITH IV Edward (Ted) A. | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 17 | BAILEY Julia S. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
| 18 | POWELL Malcolm | 2% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 10% | ||
| 19 | MACKINNON Joshua | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | ||
| 20 | KOKE Kristen | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
| 21 | BIELEWICZ Nicholas | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 22 | SHANKS Jennifer | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 23 | MACKINNON Nathaniel | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 24 | LIMM Christopher | 21% | 42% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | TAYLOR Harrison | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
| 26 | WITTKOWER Dylan | 2% | 19% | 44% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 27 | FERGUSON Sam C. | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | ||
| 28 | LARSON Winston | 6% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 2% | ||
| 29 | SHANKS Aidan T. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 30 | TETTERTON Jr Joseph S. | 2% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 31 | DONG Bowen | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | GESICK Gabrielle | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 33 | MOELLER Virginia | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | ||
| 34 | WILSON Reagan Ophelia | 3% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% | ||
| 36 | STRASSLER James | 11% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 3% | ||
| 37 | BURNSIDE Caden | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 1% | |
| 38 | TREADWAY Ella | 6% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 39 | FISCHMAN Margaret | 8% | 27% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 40 | DOLLINGS Taryn | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
| 42 | ESMALLA Breanna | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 43 | BAILEY Linwood | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.