Richmond Fencing Club - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GALEMORE Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
2 | SMIGRODZKI Nymeria | 100% | 91% | 57% | 18% | 2% | ||
3 | DYER John G. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 9% | |
3 | CLICK Aiden | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 2% | - |
5 | MCKEVITT Conner M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 16% | |
6 | PRICE Owen | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 6% | < 1% | |
7 | TURPIE Michael (Mike) J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | |
8 | MARSH Joseph J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% | 17% | |
9 | SLACK Mary-Stuart F. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 5% | ||
10 | MELENDEZ Victor J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
11 | NORTH Zoe M. | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
12 | WALTERS Elaine G. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | ||
13 | KOKE Matthew C. | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
14 | KAST Quinn J. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 12% | 1% | |
15 | ISAACSON Bjorn | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
16 | SMITH IV Edward (Ted) A. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
17 | BAILEY Julia S. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% | |
18 | POWELL Malcolm | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 10% | ||
19 | MACKINNON Joshua | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 5% | ||
20 | KOKE Kristen | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% | |
21 | BIELEWICZ Nicholas | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
22 | SHANKS Jennifer | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 1% | |
23 | MACKINNON Nathaniel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
24 | LIMM Christopher | 100% | 79% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | |
24 | TAYLOR Harrison | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
26 | WITTKOWER Dylan | 100% | 98% | 79% | 35% | 7% | - | |
27 | FERGUSON Sam C. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 5% | ||
28 | LARSON Winston | 100% | 94% | 66% | 24% | 2% | ||
29 | SHANKS Aidan T. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
30 | TETTERTON Jr Joseph S. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
31 | DONG Bowen | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 4% | - | |
32 | GESICK Gabrielle | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
33 | MOELLER Virginia | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 4% | ||
34 | WILSON Reagan Ophelia | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 8% | ||
36 | STRASSLER James | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 3% | ||
37 | BURNSIDE Caden | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 19% | 1% | |
38 | TREADWAY Ella | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
39 | FISCHMAN Margaret | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
40 | DOLLINGS Taryn | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
42 | ESMALLA Breanna | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
43 | BAILEY Linwood | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.