New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
| 2 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
| 3 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 17% | |
| 3 | GULCHIN Mark | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% | |
| 5 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | |
| 6 | GHEDINI Luca | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 5% | |
| 7 | LI Bradley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 24% | |
| 8 | TANG Terry | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 1% | |
| 9 | WONG Jackson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
| 10 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 26% | |
| 11 | HOU Gaven | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 5% | |
| 12 | TANG Royce | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 13 | FOGELSON Hugh | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 14 | KIAYIAS Aris | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 15 | GERRISH William | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
| 16 | LIU ERIC | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% | 3% | |
| 17 | TAN Aidan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% | |
| 18 | TOOMRE Luca | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 19 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 20 | ZENG Rick | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 4% | |
| 21 | WANG Rory | 100% | 85% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | HUANG Jinyao | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | 1% | |
| 22 | SHANNON Jack | 100% | 83% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | LEE Charles T | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 7% | |
| 25 | RUIZ ALMEIDA Muhammad | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
| 26 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 5% |
| 27 | KELKAR Aakash | 100% | 78% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | GOLDYUK Steven | 100% | 69% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 29 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 52% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 31 | XU Nathan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 32 | XIE Jicheng | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | CHENG Logan | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 34 | KRZYWON Dylan | 100% | 98% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 35 | CHEN Hanson | 100% | 82% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | PAULUS Gregory | 100% | 39% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 36 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.