New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% |
| 2 | SO Catelyn | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 41% | 13% |
| 3 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 13% |
| 3 | FESTA Carina | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 5 | MARYASH Samantha | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 6 | CHIARELLI Valentina | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
| 7 | FLATT Sophia | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 1% |
| 8 | MCKEE Brynnley | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
| 9 | GUVEN Coco | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 10 | GOMERMAN Sophia | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
| 11 | DONG Angel | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 8% |
| 12 | HE Lizbeth | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 13% |
| 13 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 14 | JEONG Katie | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% |
| 15 | MUND Ruth | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 16 | MALEK Zolie | 6% | 22% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 17 | KHAN Alissa | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 11% |
| 18 | BERRIOS Catalina | 3% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 19 | NAGORNAYA Uliana | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 20 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 21 | LIM Alexa J. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 22 | KNOBEL Sophia | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 23 | LIU Yifei | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 24 | FREEMAN Armine | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% | |
| 25 | SRINATH Lyra A. | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | KALINICHENKO Yekaterina | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 27 | YOUNG Audrey | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% |
| 28 | DAI Olivia | - | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 29 | MARGULIAN Maria | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 30 | CHIANG Melissa | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 31 | KANDADAI Lara | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 32 | MYAT Chloe | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 33 | BUSH Bethany | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
| 34 | PROBASCO Leila | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 35 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | 12% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | ZHANG Emily | 8% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 37 | KONNIKOV Esther E. | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 38 | MAGITSKY Leila | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | NGUYEN Stella | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 40 | BUSH Divina | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | CHAVAN Arya | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.