New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% |
2 | SO Catelyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 13% |
3 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 13% |
3 | FESTA Carina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 9% |
5 | MARYASH Samantha | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
6 | CHIARELLI Valentina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% |
7 | FLATT Sophia | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
8 | MCKEE Brynnley | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% | |
9 | GUVEN Coco | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 24% | 4% |
10 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% | |
11 | DONG Angel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 8% |
12 | HE Lizbeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 13% |
13 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
14 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 26% |
15 | MUND Ruth | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
16 | MALEK Zolie | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - |
17 | KHAN Alissa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 11% |
18 | BERRIOS Catalina | 100% | 97% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
19 | NAGORNAYA Uliana | 100% | 95% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
20 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
21 | LIM Alexa J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
22 | KNOBEL Sophia | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
23 | LIU Yifei | 100% | 91% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
24 | FREEMAN Armine | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
25 | SRINATH Lyra A. | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | |
26 | KALINICHENKO Yekaterina | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
27 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 6% |
28 | DAI Olivia | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
29 | MARGULIAN Maria | 100% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
30 | CHIANG Melissa | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
31 | KANDADAI Lara | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
32 | MYAT Chloe | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 22% | 5% | - |
33 | BUSH Bethany | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
34 | PROBASCO Leila | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
35 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | 100% | 88% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
35 | ZHANG Emily | 100% | 92% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
37 | KONNIKOV Esther E. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
38 | MAGITSKY Leila | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
39 | NGUYEN Stella | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
40 | BUSH Divina | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
41 | CHAVAN Arya | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.