New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GONZALEZ Emilio A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
| 2 | BAE Jason I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
| 3 | SUGIURA Samuel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
| 3 | SAHAY Kenji | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 7% | |
| 5 | KUSHKOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 21% |
| 5 | KWALWASSER Eric | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
| 7 | IDRISSI Idris | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 27% | 3% |
| 8 | ANAND Sahil Z. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | GONG Jerry | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 10 | LIU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 11 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 11% |
| 12 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 13 | WANG daniel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
| 14 | KIM Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 15 | NGUYEN Anthony | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 16 | NARDINI Nathanael P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 31% | 7% |
| 17 | LI Yao (Liam) | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 18 | HUANG Maxwell H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 19 | LEE Ashe | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 20 | BONETTI Brayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
| 21 | TURCK Caspar J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% | |
| 22 | MARGULIS Jared | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 23 | LIGH Checed | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 24 | DAI Gary | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 25 | BRANDT Jaden | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 25 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | 100% | 74% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 27 | EYBELMAN Ariel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% | 2% |
| 28 | PRIEUR Christian F. | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 29 | FRANCOIS Alexander C. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 30 | ALAVE Kyle | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 31 | OH Aster | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 32 | CARROLL Charles | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 33 | URSU Marcel T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% | |
| 34 | LEUNG Ian | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | - | |
| 35 | LIN Philip T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 36 | MARGULIAN Grant | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | TIAGI George | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 38 | HE Bowen | 100% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 39 | HOUSER Evan | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | LIN Maxim | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | MENDOZA Diwa | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 42 | DUMOULIN Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 31% | 7% |
| 43 | BOULAIS Andrew D. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 44 | TSAO Oliver | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 45 | LIM Brandon | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 46 | SINGER Marcus | 100% | 88% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | MONTALVO Matthew | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 48 | WONG Caleb W. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 49 | NAYAK Surin K. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 50 | KATZ Ryan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
| 51 | KESSLER Nathan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 52 | KONG Alan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% |
| 52 | ALMEDA Stanislav | 100% | 91% | 57% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | PETRE Tudor | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | SCHARR-WEINER Nathan | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 56 | WITCZAK Mateus | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 57 | LIN Justin | 100% | 97% | 82% | 53% | 22% | 5% | 1% |
| 57 | LAUB William | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 59 | ABDEL-DAYEM Ibrahim | 100% | 71% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 60 | HOLTSCHLAG Milo | 100% | 89% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 61 | LEE Andrew | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.