New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Jaelyn A. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 52% |
| 2 | WU Julianna Y. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
| 3 | YU Lauren C. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 3 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% | |
| 5 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% |
| 6 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 43% | 43% |
| 7 | SEO Irene Y. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
| 8 | FU Qihan | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
| 9 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 45% | 18% |
| 10 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 6% |
| 11 | XIANG Emma | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% |
| 12 | WONG Sophia M. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% |
| 13 | LEE Lavender | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% |
| 14 | ROY Layla | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
| 15 | ZHENG Julie | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
| 16 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 17 | HUANG Natalie | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 18 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 3% |
| 19 | WANG Jasmine | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 20 | YANG Lingting | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 21 | SHA Yi Ling | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
| 22 | NEUMAN Sophie | 14% | 40% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 23 | CHARALEL Jessica | 2% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 24 | GU Emily | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 25 | YANG Iris | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 26 | MI Aileen | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 27 | RASO Olivia | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 28 | HOU Wendong | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 28 | FIELD Julianna | 39% | 40% | 17% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 30 | CHOW Annabelle | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 31 | LEVY Avery | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | PAULUS Isabella | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 34 | JIANG Claire | 3% | 23% | 46% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 35 | LENZ Zoe N. | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 36 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | 3% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | BAMFORD Anna | 20% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | POPOVA Polina | 46% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | HUBERT AVA CLAIRE | 22% | 52% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 40 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 19% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | WANG Rachael | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.