New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | LIU Jaelyn A. | V D V V V V | V V V V V | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
2 | WU Julianna Y. | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
3 | YU Lauren C. | V V D V V D | V V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
3 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
5 | LIU Angel(Daying) | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
6 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | D V V D V V | V V D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
7 | SEO Irene Y. | V D V D D V | V V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
8 | FU Qihan | V D D D D | V V V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
9 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | V V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
10 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | V V V D V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
11 | XIANG Emma | V V V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
12 | WONG Sophia M. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
13 | LEE Lavender | V V V V D V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
14 | ROY Layla | D V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
15 | ZHENG Julie | V V V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
16 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | V V D D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
17 | HUANG Natalie | V V V V V V | D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
18 | ORVANANOS Anice | V V V D D V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
19 | WANG Jasmine | V V V D V D | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
20 | YANG Lingting | V D V V D D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
21 | SHA Yi Ling | V D D V V D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
22 | NEUMAN Sophie | D D V V D V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
23 | CHARALEL Jessica | V D D D V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
24 | GU Emily | V D D V V D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
25 | YANG Iris | D D V D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
26 | MI Aileen | D D V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
27 | RASO Olivia | V D D D D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
28 | HOU Wendong | D V D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
28 | FIELD Julianna | D V V D D D | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
30 | CHOW Annabelle | D D D V V D | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
31 | LEVY Avery | D D D D V V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
32 | PAULUS Isabella | V D D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
33 | MARKOVSKY Nina | D D V V D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
34 | JIANG Claire | V D D D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
35 | LENZ Zoe N. | D D D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
36 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | D D D V D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
37 | BAMFORD Anna | D V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
38 | POPOVA Polina | D D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
39 | HUBERT AVA CLAIRE | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
40 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
41 | WANG Rachael | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.