New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
| 2 | KIM Shaun M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% |
| 3 | KUSHKOV Veniamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
| 3 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
| 5 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% |
| 5 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 34% |
| 7 | OH Triton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% |
| 8 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 9 | PENG Bryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 19% |
| 10 | BAE Jason I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 25% |
| 11 | KILGALLEN William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
| 11 | TASIKAS Stylianos | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 13 | WU Wilmund | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
| 14 | WEBER Mattias A. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 15 | WANG Robert | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
| 16 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
| 17 | LEONARD Charles | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 18 | KOGAN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
| 19 | DOLAN Charles R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 13% |
| 20 | PIWOWAR Alex | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 21 | WAXLER Seth B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
| 22 | STERN Tobias | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 23 | KUSHKOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 40% | 8% |
| 24 | HUANG Connor | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 25 | MORALES Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 4% |
| 26 | HONG Robert | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | ENGEL Peter | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 28 | LI Yao (Liam) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% | 1% |
| 29 | SMINK Oliver | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 30 | DEKA Tanush | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | KESSLER Josh | 100% | 94% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | EYBELMAN Ariel | 100% | 95% | 73% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 33 | MOULTON Ian | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 34 | SHI Erick | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 5% |
| 36 | GILSON Lucas B. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
| 37 | MCCARTHY Devan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 38 | MARGULIAN Grant | 100% | 98% | 73% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 39 | PERRON Robert | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% |
| 40 | MENDOZA Luca | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 41 | DAI Gary | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 42 | KAPOOR Tanmay | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 43 | BOULAIS Andrew D. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 44 | SHINCHUK Daniel | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 45 | TAUER Sam | 100% | 74% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 46 | ANAND Sahil Z. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 47 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
| 48 | GONG Jerry | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 49 | WRIGHT Zachary | 100% | 94% | 72% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 50 | DUMOULIN Gabriel | 100% | 96% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 51 | FLITSANOV Macabee | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 52 | HUANG Tom | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 53 | TIAGI Daniel | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | KESSLER Nathan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 54 | SHIPITSIN Yaroslav | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | KUMAR Shivai | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 57 | WONG Caleb W. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 58 | HOFFMAN Pasquale | 100% | 60% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 59 | LIGH Checed | 100% | 90% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 59 | STOLPER Max | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 61 | DESAUTELS Connor | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 62 | LAUB William | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | FARMER Rohan | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.