New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | HILD Nisha | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 2 | PRIEUR Lauren | V V D V D | V V V V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 3 | LEE Hannah | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 3 | SINHA Anika | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 5 | YUAN Greta | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 6 | NATH Trisha | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 7 | CHIANG Emily | V D V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 8 | LEE Sophia | V D V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 9 | MCKEE Ainsley | V V V V D | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 10 | GRINBERG Aliya | V V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 11 | FESTA Carina | D V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 12 | VADASZ Ibla P. | D V V V V D | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 13 | KIM Marley I. | V V V V D D | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 14 | OBRADOVIC Ana | D V D V V | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 15 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | V D V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 16 | LU Elaine | V D D V D | V V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 17 | JEONG Katie | V V V V V | D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 18 | NGUYEN Ella | V D V V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 19 | TSUI Natalie | V V D V D V | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 20 | LIGH Erenei J. | D V V D V V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 21 | HE Lizbeth | V D D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 22 | PENG Florella | V D V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 23 | SO Catelyn | V V D D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 24 | GRAFF Sophie | V D V D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 25 | MARGULIAN Maria | V V D D V D | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 26 | DONG Angel | D D V D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 27 | MCKEE Brynnley | D D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 28 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | D V D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 29 | SADOVA Olga | D D V D D | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 29 | DAI Olivia | D D D V D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 31 | YOUNG Audrey | D D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 32 | KNOBEL Sophia | D V D D D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 33 | YEN Natalie | D V V V D | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 34 | NAYAK Esha | V V V D D | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 35 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | D V V D D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 36 | LAGOON Miriam | V V D V D D | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 37 | KALINICHENKO Yekaterina | D V D D V | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 38 | KHAN Alissa | V V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 39 | GOMERMAN Sophia | V V D D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 40 | NAGORNAYA Uliana | D D D D V V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 41 | NAYAK Anika | D D D V D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 42 | DAMDINSUREN Sophie | D D D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 43 | NAYAK Indra | D V D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 44 | MAKLIN Sofia | D D D D V | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 45 | FLATT Sophia | D D D D D V | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 46 | ZHANG Emily | D D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 47 | GIBEK Victoria | D D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 48 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | D D D D V D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 49 | GOW Sydney | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 50 | WOTZAK Kaia | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 51 | PROBASCO Leila | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.