New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HILD Nisha | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
| 2 | PRIEUR Lauren | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
| 3 | LEE Hannah | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 3 | SINHA Anika | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 5 | YUAN Greta | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 6 | NATH Trisha | - | - | 4% | 20% | 41% | 28% | 6% |
| 7 | CHIANG Emily | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% | |
| 8 | LEE Sophia | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
| 9 | MCKEE Ainsley | 3% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% | |
| 10 | GRINBERG Aliya | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% | |
| 11 | FESTA Carina | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 12 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
| 13 | KIM Marley I. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
| 14 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 15 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 41% | 27% | |
| 16 | LU Elaine | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% | |
| 17 | JEONG Katie | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | |
| 18 | NGUYEN Ella | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | |
| 19 | TSUI Natalie | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 20 | LIGH Erenei J. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 12% |
| 21 | HE Lizbeth | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 22 | PENG Florella | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 23 | SO Catelyn | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | |
| 24 | GRAFF Sophie | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% | |
| 25 | MARGULIAN Maria | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | DONG Angel | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
| 27 | MCKEE Brynnley | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 28 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 29 | SADOVA Olga | 1% | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
| 29 | DAI Olivia | 16% | 36% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | YOUNG Audrey | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 32 | KNOBEL Sophia | 39% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 33 | YEN Natalie | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | NAYAK Esha | 8% | 38% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | 1% | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 36 | LAGOON Miriam | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | KALINICHENKO Yekaterina | 28% | 48% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 38 | KHAN Alissa | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 39 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 2% | |
| 40 | NAGORNAYA Uliana | 10% | 37% | 39% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | NAYAK Anika | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 42 | DAMDINSUREN Sophie | 34% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 43 | NAYAK Indra | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | |
| 44 | MAKLIN Sofia | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% | |
| 45 | FLATT Sophia | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 46 | ZHANG Emily | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | GIBEK Victoria | 4% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 48 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 49 | GOW Sydney | 63% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 50 | WOTZAK Kaia | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 51 | PROBASCO Leila | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.