New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | NGUYEN Anthony | D V V V V | V V V V V | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 2 | KIM Ethan | D D D V V | V V V V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 3 | BONETTI Brayden | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 3 | LIU Kevin | D V D V V | V V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 5 | PEREIRA Beckham | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 6 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 7 | LIN Maxim | V V V V V | V V D | 1.5 | 5 | +3.5 |
| 8 | WANG daniel | V V D V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 9 | ALAVE Kyle | V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 10 | NARDINI Nathanael P. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 11 | MEHAN Nicholas | V V D V V V | V D | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
| 12 | WELSTEAD Nicholas | D V V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 13 | LIN Philip T. | D D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 14 | KIETLINSKI Samuel | D V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 15 | LEUNG Ian | V V D D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 16 | URSU Marcel T. | V D V D D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 17 | DAI Zihou | V V V V D | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 18 | MEYERSON Jacob | V V V D V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 19 | PINTO Marcus | V V V D D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 20 | WAXLER Ryan | D V V V D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 21 | FADEL Alexander | D D V V V D | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 22 | MONTALVO Matthew | V D D D V V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 23 | SALDARINI Glenn | V D D V D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 24 | SHAPIRO Simon | V D V D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 25 | LEE Andrew | V D V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 26 | MALDARI Luke | V D D D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 27 | LOO Jason | D V D D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 28 | GERTSBERG Eli | V D D V D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 29 | SARWAHI Viraat | D D D V D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 30 | ABDEL-DAYEM Ibrahim | D D D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 31 | CHUNG Connor | D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 32 | LIN Justin | D D D D D | V D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 33 | GOMEZ Emilio | D D D V D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 34 | HOLTSCHLAG Milo | V D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 35 | CHENG Sawyer | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 36 | MEHTA Krish | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 37 | KIM Daehwan(Benjamin) | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 38 | LOSQUADRO Joseph | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.